Search Results

September 12, 2019 | Law.com

Labor of Law: EEOC On the Line: Pay Data Is Due | 'Dynamex' Defiance | New Age-Bias Case at SCOTUS | Who Got the Work | All the Moves: Roundup

Uber's already facing a new lawsuit over driver classification, as California nears adopting new labor rules that make it harder for gig companies to declare their drivers as contractors. Plus: the EEOC isn't eager to continue pay-data collection, but the maneuvering doesn't impact the ongoing collection now. Scroll down for much more, including Who Got the Work!

1 minute read

November 8, 2018 | Litigation Daily

Ninth Circuit Upholds Block on DACA Rollback

"The government may not simultaneously both assert that its actions are legally compelled, based on its interpretation of the law, and avoid review of that assertion by the judicial branch, whose 'province and duty' it is 'to say what the law is,' " wrote Ninth Circuit Judge Kim Wardlaw, quoting from Marbury v. Madison.

1 minute read

November 8, 2018 | The Recorder

Ninth Circuit Upholds Injunction Against DACA Rollback

"The government may not simultaneously both assert that its actions are legally compelled, based on its interpretation of the law, and avoid review of that assertion by the judicial branch, whose 'province and duty' it is 'to say what the law is,'" wrote Ninth Circuit Judge Kim Wardlaw, quoting from Marbury v. Madison.

1 minute read

October 4, 2018 | The Recorder

Appeals Court Strikes $8.7M in Legal Fees Based on Coupons in Class Action Settlement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the district judge had violated the Class Action Fairness Act and tackled the legal question of what constitutes a coupon.

1 minute read

February 6, 2018 | International Edition

Hire power: 25 of the biggest lateral moves of 2017

From Kirkland and Latham laterals to Gibson Dunn and Hogan Lovells hires, a look back at some of 2017's biggest partner moves

1 minute read

June 15, 2017 | National Law Journal

These 3 IP Boutiques Still Reign at Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Intellectual property boutiques Fish & Richardson; Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner; and Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox maintain dominant positions in America Invents Act litigation, but global Am Law 50 firms continue making inroads at the PTAB.

1 minute read

October 4, 2016 | New York Law Journal

'First Monday' Fundraiser Held Tonight at NYU Law

The Office of the Appellate Defender will host its 23rd annual "First Monday in October" fundraiser tonight. The Wednesday date was selected to avoid a conflict with Rosh Ha

1 minute read

September 26, 2016 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Defender Office to Hold 'First Monday' Event

The Office of the Appellate Defender will host its 23rd annual "First Monday in October" fundraiser on Oct. 5—a Wednesday. The timing was altered this year to avoid confl

1 minute read

United States v. Hsiung

Publication Date: 2015-01-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2014-07-10
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judge, and Virginia M. Kendall, District Judge.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristen C. Limarzi (argued), Peter K. Huston, Heather S. Tewksbury, E. Kate Patchen, Jon B. Jacobs, John J. Powers III, James J. Fredericks, and Adam D. Chandler, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.
for defendant: Neal Kumar Katyal (argued), Christopher T. Handman, and Elizabeth Barchas Prelogar, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellant Hui Hsiung; Michael A. Attanasio (argued) and Jon F. Cieslak, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant.
Case Number: No. 12-10492 No. 12-10493 No. 12-10500 No. 12-10514

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 1097 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUI HSIUNG,

United States v. Hsiung

Publication Date: 2014-07-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2014-07-10
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Virginia M. Kendall, District Judge.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristen C. Limarzi (argued), Peter K. Huston, Heather S. Tewksbury, E. Kate Patchen, Jon B. Jacobs, John J. Powers III, James J. Fredericks, and Adam D. Chandler, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.
for defendant: Neal Kumar Katyal (argued), Christopher T. Handman, and Elizabeth Barchas Prelogar, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellant Hui Hsiung; Michael A. Attanasio (argued) and Jon F. Cieslak, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant, Hsuan Bin Chen; Dennis P. Riordan (argued) and Donald M. Horgan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, California, and Ted Sampsell-Jones, William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Defendants-Appellants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America; and John D. Cline, Law Office of John D. Cline, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellant AU Optronics Corporation America.
Case Number: No. 12-10492 No. 12-10493 No. 12-10500 No. 12-10514

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7760 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUI