Filter This View

  • June 12, 2014 |

    Limbach Company LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Company

     LIMBACH COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.396 F.3d 358UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR…

    1 minute read

  • June 11, 2014 |

    State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Worthington

     STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., Appellant, v. WORTHINGTON, Appellee405 F.2d 683UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUITNo. 19,194…

    1 minute read

  • June 11, 2014 |

    United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. First State Bank and Trust Co.

     United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellee, v. First State Bank and Trust Company; Bank of Hayti, Appellants.125 F.3d 680UNITED STATES…

    1 minute read

  • November 1, 2013 |

    Union Electric Co. v. Energy Ins. Mutual

    Click here for FC&S Legal Expert AnalysisUNION ELECTRIC CO.v.ENERGY INS. MUTUAL2013 WL 5291701Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.United…

    1 minute read

  • In re Perry

    Publication Date: 2003-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William P. Smith III, General Counsel, and K Gene Chapman State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta. Raymond J. Peery, York, Neb. Sarah B. Akins, Chairperson Review Panel, Savannah. R. Alex Crumbley Crumbley & Crumbley, McDonough.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: S03Y1496

    An attorney who was convicted in federal court for money laundering and theft was disb

  • Weisgram v. Marley Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-02-22
    Court: United States Supreme Court
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case concerns the respective authority of federal trial and appellate courts to decide whether, as a ma

  • Weisgram v. Marley Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-02-22
    Court: United States Supreme Court
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case concerns the respective authority of federal trial and appellate courts to decide whether, as a ma

  • May 4, 2009 | Law.com Corporate

    !-- .indented { padding-left: 15pt; padding-right: 15pt; } -- UNITED STATES SUPREME COURThr size="1" width="7

    1 minute read

  • Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    Publication Date: 2002-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-13
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Souter*fn1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 00-511, 00-

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuitThese cases arise under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Each is about the power of the

  • Conopco, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2009-07-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-14
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-3564

    PRECEDENTIALArgued January 6, 2009Before: FUENTES and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and PADOVA,*fn1 District Judge.OPINION OF THE COURTThis appeal requires us t