• United States v. Yepez

    Publication Date: 2012-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-20
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding M. James Lorenz, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Appellate Section Criminal Division, and Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California, San Diego, California, for Appellee United States. Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Appellate Section Criminal Division, and Kyle W. Hoffman and Rebecca Suzanne Kanter, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California, San Diego, California, for Appellant United States.
    for defendant: Michael Edmund Burke, San Diego, California, for Appellant David Yepez. Vincent James Brunkow, Assistant Appellate Supervisor, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for Appellee Audenago Acosta-Montes.

    Case Number: No. 09-50271 No. 09-50409

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13869UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

  • People v. Thomas

    Publication Date: 2012-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-23
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Bruce Ortega, Amy Haddix and Donna M. Provenzano, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: David Joseph Macher, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. S067519

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8263 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH TYSON THOMAS, Defendant and Appel

  • Black Kelly v. Marley

    Publication Date: 2003-03-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Justice Burke BLACK-KELLY v. MARLEY — ORDERED that the branch of this motion by the defendant to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) is denied with respect to the fi

  • B.P. and A.P., individually and on behalf of D.P., Plaintiffs v. The New York City Department of Education, Defendant, 11-CV-2141 (WFK) (MDG)

    Publication Date: 2012-01-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge William F. Kuntz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11-CV-2141 (WFK) (MDG)

    Cite as: B.P. v. NYCDOE, 11-CV-2141 (WFK) (MDG), NYLJ 1202538363001, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 6, 2012)District Judge William F.

  • David C. Copenhefer v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-27
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Barry, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 03-9000,, 03-9001

    PRECEDENTIALArgued May 3, 2012Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO and BARRY, Circuit JudgesOPINION OF THE COURTI. IntroductionThe Commonwealth appeals the order of the District Cour

  • August 16, 2001 | Special To Law.Com

    Appellee's Supplemental Brief in 'Thornton v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.'

    Court of Appeals Case No. 99-15857 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITJACALYN THORNTON,Plaintiff/Appellant,v.McCLATCHY N

    1 minute read

  • Gipson v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-08-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-08-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Steve McKEITHEN Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 09-11-00032-CR

    OPINIONThis is an appeal from the trial court's revocation of community supervision. We reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings co

  • People v. Whalen

    Publication Date: 2013-02-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-04
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bill Lockyer and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Mary Jo Graves and Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorneys General, Patrick J. Whalen, Carlos A. Martinez and Catherine Tennant Nieto, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: A. Richard Ellis, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. S054569

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1312THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,v.DANIEL LEE WHALEN, Defendant and Appe

  • Taylor v. State

    Publication Date: 2013-08-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-08-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Patrick A. Pirtle Justice.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-12-00415-CR

    On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-431, 936, Honorable Jim B. D

  • Summit Bank v. Rogers

    Publication Date: 2012-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-29
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Respondent: Law Offices of Steven B. Piser, Steven B. Piser, J. Scott Isherwood, Esner, Chang & Boyer, Andrew N. Chang Counsel for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association for Respondent: California Bankers Association, Leland Chan
    for defendant: Counsel for Appellant: Sweeney, Mason, Wilson & Bosomworth, Kurt E. Wilson, Scott A. Mangum

    Case Number: No. A129800

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 5861 SUMMIT BANK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT ROGERS, Defendant and Appel