• John P. v. Laura R.

    Publication Date: 2005-12-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    RICHMOND COUNTY Family Court Judge Porzio On July 11, 2005 Petitioner paternal grandparents John P. and Mary P. filed Petitions against the Respondent Mother Laura R.

  • City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

    Publication Date: 2000-11-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-11-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-1030

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in whichStevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined.

  • Friends of Lake View School District Incorporation No. 25 of Phillips County v. Beebe

    Publication Date: 2009-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-25
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Gruender, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-2161

    Submitted: April 14, 2009Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.On May 28, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education ordered the consolidation of the Lake View School District wit

  • Weisgram v. Marley Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-02-22
    Court: United States Supreme Court
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case concerns the respective authority of federal trial and appellate courts to decide whether, as a ma

  • March 26, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Decision of InterestPART 16, Judge DemarestJudge DemarestDecision of InterestMatter of Coram v. Board of Examiners, Sex Offender Regi

    1 minute read

  • People v. Sokolsky

    Publication Date: 2010-03-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-23
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth C. Byrne and Eric J. Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Richard E. Holly, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. B212437

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3592THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.MARK SOKOLSKY, Defendant and Appellant./

  • Weisgram v. Marley Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-02-22
    Court: United States Supreme Court
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case concerns the respective authority of federal trial and appellate courts to decide whether, as a ma

  • Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-05-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-05-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: REHNQUIST, O'CONNOR, BREYER, KENNEDY, SCALIA, STEVENS, SOUTER, THOMAS, and GINSBURG
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 98-1811

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. This case focuses on the 1984 version of

  • September 25, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Second Circuit Review

    With the U.S. Supreme Court beginning its 2009 term next month, we conduct our 25th annual review of the performance of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit over the past term, and brie

    1 minute read

  • Buckwalter v. Napoli, Kaiser Bern LLP

    Publication Date: 2005-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Swain Plaintiffs in this action are former clients of the law firm Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP ("NKB"). They