Filter This View

  • S.M. v. G.M.

    Publication Date: 2005-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Pines Plaintiff, S. M., moves by Notice of Motion (motion sequence number 008) for an order determining that the report and testim

  • September 14, 2012 | The Recorder

    R.H. v. Superior Court (San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency)

    C.A. 4th D061609 The Fourth Appellate District denied petitions for extraordinary relief. The court held that prospective adoptive parents had no right, under Welfare & Insti

    1 minute read

  • October 22, 2007 | Legal Times

    Federal Employees Face a Stunning Lack of Protection for Free Speech

    "The importance of Government employees' being assured of their right to freely comment on the con f Government, to inform the public of abuses of power and of the miscon

    1 minute read

  • Radzyminski v. Nalbone, V-5741/2-05/08G

    Publication Date: 2009-09-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-09
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: W. Duggan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: V-5741/2-05/08G

    Judge W. Dennis Duggan ALBANY COUNTY Family Court Appearances: For Petitioner: Peter J. Hickey, Esq. For Respondent: Michael P. Friedman, Esq

  • Blaisdell v. Frappiea

    Publication Date: 2013-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dawn Sestito, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the plaintiff-appellant. Mica Doctoroff, UCLA School of Law Ninth Circuit Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, also argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant. With them on the briefs was Katharine S. Mercer, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
    for defendant: Nicholas D. Acedo, Struck Wieneke & Love, P.L.C., Chandler, Arizona, argued the cause and filed a supplemental brief for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Daniel P. Struck, Struck Wieneke & Love, P.L.C, Chandler, Arizona. Jaleh Najafi, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C, Phoenix, Arizona, filed the original brief for the defendant­appellant. With him on the brief were Eileen Dennis GilBride, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, and Daniel P. Struck, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona.
    Case Number: No. 10-16845

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 10066 RIC

  • Xpedior Creditor Trust v. Credit Suisse First Boston

    Publication Date: 2003-10-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The Xpedior Creditor Trust ("Xpedior"), as a putative class representative, is suing Credit Suisse First Boston ("CSFB") (as successor-in-interest to Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp

  • March 15, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Voice of the Bar

    Rebuttal to Comments on Affidavit-of-Merit Substantial Compliance Dear Editor: I read with interest the article in the March 1 issue regarding Tunia v. St. Francis Ho

    1 minute read

  • Gillette v. Atlas, 3844/2006

    Publication Date: 2010-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-22
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Victor Alfieri
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3844/2006

    Justice Victor J. Alfieri ORANGE COUNTY Supreme Court For Defendant Gregory Atlas: Richard F. Liberth, Esq., Tarshis Catania Liberth Mahon & Milligram For Pla

  • TRUSTS AND ESTATES Matter of the Final Accounting of Michael Duffy 2001DT01229/A Surrogate's Court, Monroe County Edmund A. Calvaruso, J. Decided on September 8, 2009

    Publication Date: 2009-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Objectant, Gilbert Stone, seeks to surcharge executor Michael Duffy for losses incurred by the estate during the post September 11, 2001 stock market decline. The court holds that the executor made

  • October 5, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Effect of 'Amalfitano v. Rosenberg' on Judiciary Law §487 Claims

    Two recent articles by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone—"The Use of Lawyer-Targeted Judiciary Law &se

    1 minute read