Filter This View

  • People v. Thomas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-03
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Alice B. Lustre and Sharon E. Loughner, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Robert Derham, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S093456

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1656THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALEX DALE THOMAS, Defe

  • Hatch v. Superior Court

    Publication Date: 2000-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-03-31
    Court: Cal. Ct. App.
    Judge: BENKE, J., HALLER, J., MCDONALD, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert E. Boyce and Laura G. Schaefer
    for defendant: Paul J. Pfingst et. al.
    Case Number: No. D032423

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Petitioner David Irving Hatch challenges his being held to answer on many charges of transmitting harmful m

  • Gass v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-03
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Clay, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1733

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: July 22, 2008Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; MOORE and CLAY, Circuit Judges.CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the

  • Ameer Hasarafally v. USA

    Publication Date: 2012-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner (Pro Se): Ameer Hasarafally, Big Spring, TX.
    for defendant: For Respondent: Saray Y. Lai, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 3457 (SAS); S1 05 CR 401 (MBM)

    Cite as: Ameer Hasarafally v. USA, 10 Civ. 3457 (SAS), NYLJ 1202582177853, at *1 (SDNY, Decided December 10, 2012)District Judge Shira Scheindlinp cl

  • Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-04-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-04-17
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Kim McLane Wardlaw and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric Alan Isaacson (argued), Rachel L. Jensen, Amanda M. Frame, and Thomas R. Merrick, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, California; Amber L. Eck, Zeldes & Haeggquist, LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.
    for defendant: Jill A. Martin (argued), Rancho Palos Verdes, California; David Keith Schneider, Yunker & Schneider, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. Christopher M. Burke, Scott & Scott LLP, San Diego, California, for Amicus Curiae Consumer Attorneys of California. David Blair-Loy, ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties, San Diego, California, for Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego & Imperial Counties.
    Case Number: No. 11-55016

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3774TARLA MAKAEFF, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant,

  • Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-04-00518-CV

    OPINIONThe issue presented is whether a statute that extinguishes a litigant's right to pursue an accrued and pending common law cause of action--without providing a grace period--transcends the le

  • Jackson v. Danberg

    Publication Date: 2010-02-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-01
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 09-1925 and 09-2052

    PRECEDENTIALArgued December 16, 2009Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTThis appeal, brought by a class of inmates sentenced to death by the Stat

  • People v. Alexander

    Publication Date: 2010-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-15
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Sharlene A. Honnaka, Richard T. Breen, Keith H. Borjon, John R. Gorey and Stacy S. Schwartz, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Susan Ten Kwan and Joseph Chabot, Deputy State Public Defenders; and Thomas Kallay, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S053228

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9043THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDRE STEPHEN ALEXANDER, Defendant and

  • Matter of Sylvan Lawrence, 175/82

    Publication Date: 2010-09-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Surrogate's Court, New York County
    Judge: Referee Howard A. Levine
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 175/82

    Cite as: Matter of Sylvan Lawrence, 175/82, NYLJ 1202471778971, at *1 (Surr., NY, Decided August 27, 2010)Referee Howard A. LevineDecided

  • Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. Knudson

    Publication Date: 2002-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-08
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Scalia.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-1786

    534 U. S. ____ (2002)On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth CircuitThe question presented is whether �502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act