• September 19, 2002 | Legal Times

    From Partner to General Counsel to Defendant

    The Securities and Exchange Commission claims he conspired to loot his own company. Former Sen. Warren Rudman calls him brilliant, decent and a model of integrity. Robert Morgenthau, the Manha

    1 minute read

  • September 16, 2002 | Legal Times

    What Happened to Mark Belnick?

    The Securities and Exchange Commission claims he conspired to loot his own company. Former Sen. Warren Rudman calls him brilliant, decent, and a model of integrity. Robert Morgenthau, the Manhattan

    1 minute read

  • April 30, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Law Students/Aspiring Filmmakers Bringing 'Brown' to Big Screen

    If you want to be in the movies -- a business enterprise short on rules and precedents but wide open to opportunity for those with zealous confidence -- it helps to be a lawyer. Even b

    1 minute read

  • Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-12
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Newman, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for plaintiffs-appellees: Evan Chesler, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York.
    for defendant: Attorney for defendants-appellants: Robert Breisblatt, Welsh & Katz, Chicago.

    Case Number: 2007-1438

    Published opinionBefore NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.This suit arose in accordance with the provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act, codified at 35 U.S.C. §271(e) and 21 U.S.C. 

  • Richbell Information Services Inc. v. Jupiter Partners LP

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered March 15, 2002, which dismissed the action, bringing up for review a prior order which granted

  • Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Dooney Bourke Inc.

    Publication Date: 2006-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Richard Cardamone
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Robert E. Shapiro, (Peter J. Barack, Wendi E. Sloane, Shermin Izadpanah, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg LLP, Theodore C.

  • Smooth Dental PLLC v. Clarendon Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2005-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    KINGS COUNTY Civil Court Judge Nadelson Defendant filed this Motion to Renew and Reargue a prior decision of this court which denied as premature Defendant's earlier M

  • Silver v. Pataki

    Publication Date: 2003-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Plaintiffs appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 28, 2002, which, upon the grant of the Governor's cross motion for summary judgm

  • Appearances Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel for Consolidated Securities Class Action: By: Donald R. Hall, Jr., Esq., Frederic Scott Fox, Esq., Robert N. Kaplan, Esq., Kaplan Fox Kilsheimer LLP, New Yo

    Publication Date: 2009-11-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Appearances Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel for Consolidated Securities Class Action: By: Donald R. Hall, Jr., Esq., Frederic Scott Fox, Esq., Robert N. Kaplan, Esq., Kaplan Fox & Kils

  • Richbell Information Services Inc. v. Jupiter Partners LP

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered March 15, 2002, which dismissed the action, bringing up for review a prior order which granted