Filter This View

  • April 27, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Justices Consider Who Decides Arbitration Clauses' Enforceability

    The U.S. Supreme Court's pro-arbitration trend appears intact after oral arguments Monday in a key case asking whether it should be courts or arbitrators themselves who rule on the enforceability o

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Heller Ehrman Partners Schedule Dissolution Vote Heller Ehrman partners will vote to dissolve the firm today. The Recorder, a Law Journal affiliate, reports

    1 minute read

  • August 17, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Bank of New York to NY AG: Stay Out of Our $8.5 Billion Deal

    Another day, another round of attacks and counterattacks in the Countrywide/Bank of America Corporation mortgage-backed securities drama. On Tuesday Bank of New York Mellon came out swingin

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2008 | The Recorder

    San Francisco's Heller Ehrman Dissolves After 118 Years

    After 118 years, San Francisco law firm Heller Ehrman said last week that it would dissolve in a partnership vote. In a firmwide "all hands" videoconference Thursday afternoon, Ch

    1 minute read

  • April 27, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Court Hears Arbitration Review Case

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court's pro-arbitration trend appears intact after oral arguments Monday in a key case asking whether it should be courts or arbitrators themselves who rule

    1 minute read

  • December 27, 2012 | International

    Allen & Overy Recruits Hanoi Partner

    Allen & Overy has hired a partner to lead its Hanoi office.   Tran Anh Duc joins the Magic Circle f

    1 minute read

  • Rock River Communications, Inc. v. Universal Music Group, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-09-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-18
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding Before: Harry Pregerson and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and Wiley Y. Daniel, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald Manwell Falk (argued), Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, California; Maxwell Blecher and Courtney A. Palko, Blecher & Collins, P.C., Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
    for defendant: Kelly M. Klaus (argued), David C. Dinielli and Benjamin J. Maro, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    Case Number: No. 11-57168 No. 12-55180

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 10458 ROCK RIVER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVE

  • August 1, 2000 | National Law Journal

    Supreme Court Rulings in Business Cases Covered a Broad Range

    The Supreme Court decided a broad range of cases affecting businesses in the October 1999 term. The Court vigorously enforced federal pre-emption and declined to expand several regulatory sche

    1 minute read

  • Mulgrew v. The Board of Education of the City School District of The City of New York, 105855/2011

    Publication Date: 2011-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term Part 12
    Judge: Justice Paul G. Feinman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the plaintiffs By: Charles G. Moerdler, Esq., Alan M. Klinger, Esq., Ernst H. Rosenberger, Esq., Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY. Co-Counsel: Carol L. Gerstl, Esq., Adam S. Ross, Esq., United Federation of Teachers, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For the defendants: By: Chlarens Orsland, Esq., Emily Sweet, Esq., Michael A. Cardozo, Esq., Corporation Counsel of City of New York, New York, NY. For the Intervenor-Defendants: By: Andrew R. Dunlap, Esq., Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq., Jennifer M. H Selendy, Esq., Devora Allon, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY. By: Stewart D. Aaron, Esq., Emily A. Kim, Esq., Mary Sylvester, Esq., Natalie Walker, Esq., Grace Pickering, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, New York, NY. By: Avi Schick, Esq., SNR Denton, New York, NY. By: Samidh Guha, Esq., Jessica Budoff, Esq., Jason Sunshine, Esq., Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Field LLP, New York, NY. By: Theodore V. Wells, Jr., Esq., David W. Brown, Esq., Ralia E. Polechronis, Esq., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY. By: Joseph De Simone, Esq., Bradford Jealous, III, Esq., Katie E. Fernandez, Esq., Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 105855/2011

    Cite as: Mulgrew v. The Board of Education of the City School District of The City of New York, 105855/2011, NYLJ 1202506471580, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 21, 2011)p c

  • July 31, 2008 | Law.com Corporate

    Candidates Who Passed The July 2008 NYS Bar Exam

    The New York State Board of Law Examiners announced last week that the passing rate for graduates of New York’s 15 law schools taking

    1 minute read