Filter This View

  • Griffin v. Suffolk County, 13-CV-4375

    Publication Date: 2013-12-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner proceeds pro se.
    for defendant: Respondents are represented by Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney of Suffolk County, by Marcia R. Kucera, Assistant District Attorney, Riverhead, NY.
    Case Number: 13-CV-4375

    Cite as: Griffin v. Suffolk County, 13-CV-4375, NYLJ 1202634507826, at *1 (EDNY, Decided December 16, 2013) 13-CV-4375 District Judge Joseph F. B

  • In re: Coudert Brothers LLP, 06-12226 (RDD)

    Publication Date: 2013-12-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District
    Judge: Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: By: David S. Tannenbaum and Karen S. Frieman for Development Specialists, Inc., Stern Tannenbaum & Bell LLP.
    for defendant: By: Edward J.M. Little and Lisa A. Cahill for Statek Corporation., Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.
    Case Number: 06-12226 (RDD)

    Cite as: In re: Coudert Brothers LLP, 06-12226 (RDD), NYLJ 1202634550869, at *1 (Bankruptcy., SD, Decided August 19, 2013) 06-12226 (RDD) Bankrupt

  • Sander v. State Bar of California

    Publication Date: 2013-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-19
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, James M. Chadwick, Evgenia N. Fkiaras, David E. Snyder and Guylyn R. Cummins for Plaintiff and Appellant California First Amendment Coalition. Jane Roberta Yakowitz; Bostwick & Jassy, Gary L. Bostwick, Jean-Paul Jassy and Kevin L. Vick for Plaintiffs and Appellants Richard Sander and Joe Hicks.
    for defendant: Kerr & Wagstaffe, James M. Wagstaffe, Michael John Von Loewenfeldt; Starr Babcock, Lawrence C. Yee and Rachel S. Grunberg for Defendants and Respondents. Snell & Wilmer, Mary-Christine Sungaila and Harsh P. Parikh for Multicultural Bar Alliance as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Reed Smith and Dennis Peter Maio for The Bar Association of San Francisco as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Eva Paterson, Allison S. Elgart and Fabián Rentería for Equal Justice Society as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S194951

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13702 RICHARD SANDER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BAR

  • December 20, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Corporate Counsel Collection

    img alt="" border="0" height="85" src="http://www.law.com/image/pa/charts/cls

    1 minute read

  • Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-19
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The Consumer Law Group, Alan M. Mansfield; Peitzman Weg and Michael A. Bowse for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Seth E. Mermin, Thomas Bennigson and Timothy Sun for Consumer Action, Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, The Public Health Law Center, Inc., and Public Good Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Morrison & Foerster, Shirley J. Hufstelder and Benjamin J. Fox for Defendant and Appellant Argus Health Systems, Inc. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Gail E. Lees, Christopher Chorba, Blaine H. Evanson; Husch Blackwell, Thomas M. Dee and Christopher A. Smith for Defendant and Appellant Express Scripts, Inc. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Thomas M. Peterson, Molly Moriarty Lane and Richard S. Odom for Defendant and Appellant Anthem-Prescription Management, LLC. Steptoe & Johnson, Martin D. Schneiderman and Jason Levin for Defendants and Appellants AdvancePCS, AdvancePCS Health L.P., PharmaCare Management Services, Inc., and TDI Managed Services, Inc. Holland & Knight, Richard T. Williams and Tara L. Cooper for Defendants and Appellants PharmaCare and TDI Managed Services.
    Case Number: No. S203124

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13572 JERRY BEEMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ANTHEM PRE

  • December 19, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Lawsuits Are Anticipated Against Volcker Rule

    WASHINGTON WHEN FEDERAL financial regulators last week adopted the massive Volcker Rule, it didn't mean their work was finished. If anything, lawyers say the work is just begi

    1 minute read

  • December 16, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Banks Draw Out Their Knives

    When federal financial regulators last week adopted the massive Volcker Rule, it didn't mean their work was finished. If anything, lawyers say the work is just beginning. Legal ch

    1 minute read

  • December 13, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    The Churn: Dentons Adds Toronto Dealmaker, Plus More Lateral Moves

    CORRECTION, 12/17/13, 11:20 a.m. EST: An earlier version of this story misspelled in one instance the name of DLA Piper of counsel Steven Levitsky. The information has b

    1 minute read

  • December 12, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Lawyers Predict Volcker Rule Likely to Face Challenges

    Given the Volcker Rule's scope and magnitude, lawyers warn that legal challenges are practically inevitable. Regulators released the massive rule—which weighs in at 71 p

    1 minute read

  • Cartledge v. Montano

    Publication Date: 2013-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James Howard and Sharon Howard The Howard Law Firm, Tucker, for appellant.
    for defendant: Andrew Holliday and Susan Mulherin Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, Augusta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A13A1580

    The trial court erred in granting the defendant doctor's motion in limine to exclude the plaintiff's expert witness's testimony on the ground that he was not qualified, since this finding was based