Filter This View

  • February 8, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Law Firm Salary Increases Raise Eyebrows, Expectations

    After a day of calling Philadelphia firms to see whether they planned on responding to the recent New York and California salary increases and getting answers to the tune of "it depends on what the

    1 minute read

  • December 22, 2011 | Legaltech News

    What's Your Biggest Digital Distraction?

    We live in a world where the possibilities of big data are endless and technology has finally created a seamlessly productive universe in which we faultlessly live and function. Yeah, right.

    1 minute read

  • April 3, 2009 | The Recorder

    Heller Ehrman, Thelen Face Huge Wage Lawsuits

    In the five months since Thelen's dissolution, the firm has managed to avoid bankruptcy and has paid down more than half of the bank debt that forced it to close, a firm representative said Wednesd

    1 minute read

  • Honeywell International Inc., Plaintiff v. Northshore Power Systems, LLC and Oaktree Capital Management, L.P., Defendants, 652163/10

    Publication Date: 2011-08-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS Part 60
    Judge: Justice Bernard Fried
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Clay J. Pierce, Aaron Bourke, Reed Smith LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiff: John Hagan, Reed Smith LLP, Chicago, IL.
    for defendant: For Defendant Northshore Power Systems, LLC: Stephen Juris, Thomas Keane, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York, NY. John Kirtley, Maria Kreiter, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. Milwaukee, WI. For Defendant Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.: Eric Seiler, Emily Stubbs, Christopher Colorado, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 652163/10

    Cite as: Honeywell International Inc. v. Northshore Power Systems, LLC, 652163/10, NYLJ 1202511785141, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 25, 2011)Justice Bern

  • Nouveau Elevator Industries, Inc., v. Tracey Towers Housing Co., etc.

    Publication Date: 2012-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 381012/09

    Chesney & Nicholas, LLP, Baldwin (Joyce G. Bigelow of counsel), for appellant.Reed Smith LLP, New York (James M. Andriola of counsel), for respondents. Order, Supreme Court,

  • August 1, 2006 | The American Lawyer

    Exit Strategy

    After law school and a clerkship, she finally had the chance to be in the trenches with real clients. The work was specialized and plentiful. She liked her partners, and they liked

    1 minute read

  • January 28, 2008 | National Law Journal

    Ruling on holding company value

    Valuation of an interest in an entity is the determination of what a hypothetical buyer would pay a hypothetical seller when purchasing that interest. Valuation is often a major issue in

    1 minute read

  • May 1, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    5th Circuit: No Asylum for Woman Tortured in Congo

    Monique T. Mwembie's journey to the United States from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) was a harrowing trip that even Hollywood couldn't dream up. Her story invol

    1 minute read

  • Rose v. Bank of America, N.A.

    Publication Date: 2013-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-08-01
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The Rossbacher Firm, Henry H. Rossbacher, Jeffrey Alan Goldenberg, James S. Cahill and Talin K. Tenly for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Adam Keats; Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe and Richard R. Wiebe for Center for Biological Diversity, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Arbogast Bowen and David M. Arbogast for Consumer Attorneys of California and the National Consumer Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney (San Francisco), Danny Chou, Chief of Special and Complex Litigation, Kristine Poplawski and Erin Bernstein, Deputy City Attorneys; Carmen A. Trutanich, City Attorney (Los Angeles) and Tina Hess, Deputy Chief Complex and Special Litigation, for San Francisco City Attorney and Los Angeles City Attorney as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Reed Smith, Margaret M. Grignon, Scott H. Jacobs and Zareh A. Jaltorossian for Defendant and Respondent. Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perochet, Jeremy B. Rosen and Jason R. Litt for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and California Chamber of Commerce as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Fred J. Hiestand for the Civil Justice Association of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Leland Chan for California Bankers Association and American Bankers Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. S199074

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8261 HAROLD ROSE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BANK OF AME

  • August 16, 2001 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Online Banking is Set for Takeoff

    Although the vast majority of community banks currently do not offer online banking, within three years 90 percent plan to offer electronic bill payment, 83 percent plan to offer online

    1 minute read