Filter This View

  • July 26, 2010 | National Law Journal

    What would Atticus Finch do?

    July 11 marked the 50th anniversary of the publication of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, an American classic. It is worth asking on this occasion: "What would Atticus Finch do?&q

    1 minute read

  • March 14, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble

    Decided February 17, 2005Before Straub, Pooler, and B.D. Parker, C.JJ. Plaintiff-appellant Dawn Dawson appeals from the February 5, 2003, judgment of the United States District Cou

    1 minute read

  • May 24, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Patel v. Soriano

    N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division A-4239-01T3; Appellate Division; opinion by Carchman, J.A.D.; decided and approved for publication May 18, 2004. Before Judges Carchman,

    1 minute read

  • Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2011-01-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-19
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mardirossian & Associates, Inc., Garo Mardirossian, Jill P. McDonell and Armen Akaragian; Jacobs, Jacobs & Eisfelder and Stanley K. Jacobs for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., William E. Thomson and Blaine H. Evanson, for Defendants and Appellants, Land Rover North America, Inc., Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, and Terry York Motor Cars, Ltd.
    Case Number: No. B218173

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 778SUKHSAGAR PANNU, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al., Def

  • Sachs v. Cantwell

    Publication Date: 2012-11-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge J. Paul Oetken
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 1663 (JPO)

    Cite as: Sachs v. Cantwell, 10 Civ. 1663 (JPO), NYLJ 1202578933394, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 4, 2012)District Judge J. Paul

  • United States v. Ghalani, 98 Crim. 1023

    Publication Date: 2010-07-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Farbiarz, Jesse M. Furman, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Buckley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Preet Bharara, United States Attorney
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Peter Enrique Quijano, Michael K. Bachrach Attorneys for Amicus Curiae The Center for Constitutional Rights: Andrew Weissman, Howard J. Fisher, Daniel B. Tehrani, Jenner & Block, LLP Attorney for Amicus Curiae Criminal Justice Legal Foundation: Kent S. Scheidegger Stuart Wachs, Wachs & Associates Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Center on the Administration of Criminal Law: Kristin L. Myles, Munger, Tolles & Olsen, LLP
    Case Number: 98 Crim. 1023

    Judge Lewis A. KaplanDecided: July 12, 2010Michael E. Farbiarz, Jesse M. Furman, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Bu

  • Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-07
    Court: Del. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: WALSH, HOLLAND, and HARTNETT, Justices
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Payson, Arthur L. Dent, and Gary J. Greenberg
    for defendant: Thomas J. Allingham, II and Leonard P. Stark
    Case Number: No. 106, 1999

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. HOLLAND, Justice:This is an interlocutory appeal in a sempiternal appraisal action.The petitioners-appellants (col

  • March 16, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ATTORNEY/CLIENT � PHYSICIAN / PATIENT � DAMAGES 04-2-6738 Steinberg, etc. v. Grasso, Esq., et al., App. Div. (per curiam) (24 pp.) The court reverses

    1 minute read

  • Maryland v. Shatzer

    Publication Date: 2010-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-24
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08–680

    MARYLAND, PETITIONER v.MICHAEL BLAINE SHATZER, Sr.No. 08–680In

  • In re W.B.

    Publication Date: 2012-08-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-06
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Steven T. Oetting and Meredith S. White, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. W. Scott Thorpe; and Albert C. Locher, Assistant District Attorney (Sacramento) for California District Attorneys Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent. Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae.
    for defendant: Jonathan E. Demson, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Mark Radoff and Delia Parr for California Indian Legal Services as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Paulino G. Durán, Public Defender (Sacramento), Arthur L. Bowie and Randi Barrat, Assistant Public Defenders, for the Office of the Public Defender for Sacramento County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S181638

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8873 In re W.B., JR., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,