Filter This View

  • United States v. Ghalani, 98 Crim. 1023

    Publication Date: 2010-07-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Farbiarz, Jesse M. Furman, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Buckley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Preet Bharara, United States Attorney
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Peter Enrique Quijano, Michael K. Bachrach Attorneys for Amicus Curiae The Center for Constitutional Rights: Andrew Weissman, Howard J. Fisher, Daniel B. Tehrani, Jenner & Block, LLP Attorney for Amicus Curiae Criminal Justice Legal Foundation: Kent S. Scheidegger Stuart Wachs, Wachs & Associates Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Center on the Administration of Criminal Law: Kristin L. Myles, Munger, Tolles & Olsen, LLP
    Case Number: 98 Crim. 1023

    Judge Lewis A. KaplanDecided: July 12, 2010Michael E. Farbiarz, Jesse M. Furman, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Bu

  • Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-07
    Court: Del. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: WALSH, HOLLAND, and HARTNETT, Justices
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Payson, Arthur L. Dent, and Gary J. Greenberg
    for defendant: Thomas J. Allingham, II and Leonard P. Stark
    Case Number: No. 106, 1999

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. HOLLAND, Justice:This is an interlocutory appeal in a sempiternal appraisal action.The petitioners-appellants (col

  • March 16, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ATTORNEY/CLIENT � PHYSICIAN / PATIENT � DAMAGES 04-2-6738 Steinberg, etc. v. Grasso, Esq., et al., App. Div. (per curiam) (24 pp.) The court reverses

    1 minute read

  • Maryland v. Shatzer

    Publication Date: 2010-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-24
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08–680

    MARYLAND, PETITIONER v.MICHAEL BLAINE SHATZER, Sr.No. 08–680In

  • In re W.B.

    Publication Date: 2012-08-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-06
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Steven T. Oetting and Meredith S. White, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. W. Scott Thorpe; and Albert C. Locher, Assistant District Attorney (Sacramento) for California District Attorneys Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent. Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae.
    for defendant: Jonathan E. Demson, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Mark Radoff and Delia Parr for California Indian Legal Services as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Paulino G. Durán, Public Defender (Sacramento), Arthur L. Bowie and Randi Barrat, Assistant Public Defenders, for the Office of the Public Defender for Sacramento County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S181638

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8873 In re W.B., JR., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

  • Dorsey v. United States

    Publication Date: 2012-06-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-5683 No. 11-5721

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6885 EDWARD DORSEY, SR., PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES No. 11

  • Alleyne v. United States

    Publication Date: 2013-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-17
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11–9335

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6104 ALLEN RYAN ALLEYNE, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATESp id="

  • Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. Guidry

    Publication Date: 2009-02-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Eva M. Guzman Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-05-01090-CV

    Motion for Rehearing Granted; Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, Dismissed in Part, and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed February 3, 2009.MAJORITY OPINION ON REHE

  • February 7, 2000 | National Law Journal

    Court Decisions

    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW RemediesMootness ruling proper in grant applicant's case The U.S. Labor Department properly dismis

    1 minute read

  • Joseph Rakofsky, and Rakofsky Law Firm, P.C., Plaintiffs v. The Washington Post, et al., Defendants, 105573/11

    Publication Date: 2013-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 17
    Judge: Justice Shlomo S. Hagler
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Represented By: Goldsmith & Associates, PLLC, By: Matthew H. Goldsmith, Esq., Plaintiffs Joseph Rakofsky & Rakofsky Law Firm, P.C.
    for defendant: Represented By: Williams & Connelly LLP, By Kevin T. baine, Esq., & Chetan Patil, Esq. & By Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP, By: Jonathan D. Lupkin, Esq., & Anne B. Nicholson, Esq., Defendants Washington Post, Keith L. Alexander & Jennifer Jenkins. Represented By: Proskauer Rose LLP., By Jennifer L. Jones. Esq., Defendants American Bar Association, ABAjournal.com., Debra Cassens Weiss. & Sarah Randag.
    Case Number: 105573/11

    Cite as: Rakofsky v. The Washington Post, 105573/11, NYLJ 1202601880826, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided April 29, 2013)Justice Shlomo S.