Filter This View

  • Surrogate's Court — Published in the Law Journal on: November 4, 2011,

    Publication Date: 2011-11-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    AdministrationDECREE SIGNED: ESTATE OF JOSEPH DEC (507/A/11); Jesus Medina (3243/11); Sergio Pineda (3507/11); Tatyana Prikhodko (1745/A/11); Valerie Harris (3609/11); W

  • Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Federal Maritime Commission

    Publication Date: 2008-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-08
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge: Kavanaugh, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For petitioner: Gene Schaerr, Winston & Strawn, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For respondents: Cory Cinque, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. For intervenors: Anne Mickey, Sher & Blackwell, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 06-1407

    Argued October 26, 2007Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, in which Chief Judge SE

  • July 20, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

    Houston Lawyer Builds a Defense for Michael Jackson's Personal Physician

    What does a criminal defense lawyer do when the whole world points a finger at his client? If you're Houston lawyer Ed Chernoff and your client was the King of Pop's personal physician, you

    1 minute read

  • New York State Office of Victim Services v. Murray, 3530-11

    Publication Date: 2011-08-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Albany County
    Judge: Justice Joseph C. Teresi
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York State, Edward M. Scher, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, Albany, NY
    for defendant: James Murray, 95-A-4417, Pro Se Respondent, Upstate Correctional Facility, Malone, New York
    Case Number: 3530-11

    Cite as: New York State Office of Victim Services v. Murray, 3530-11, NYLJ 1202511966226, at *1 (Sup. ALB, Decided August 15, 2011)Justice Joseph C. T

  • October 13, 1998 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 6, No. 196 -- October 13, 1998

    STATE COURT CASESFAMILY LAW� --� ALIMONY 20-2-7664� Napier v. Napier, App. Div. (per curiam) (8 pp.)� Panel reverses denial of wife's post- judgment for an increase and extension o

    1 minute read

  • February 28, 2012 | Texas Lawyer

    Travis County Jury Returns $1.29 Million Verdict Against DLA Piper

    A Travis County jury has returned a $1.29 million verdict against DLA Piper after finding the firm was negligent in failing to advise an Australian businessman that the firm did not represent

    1 minute read

  • August 12, 2003 | The Recorder

    From the Courts

    COPYRIGHTSilvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment,Inc.9th Circuit; June 3, 2003Accrued cause of action for copyright infringement may be as

    1 minute read

  • URBAN BOX OFFICE NETWORK, INC. v. INTERFASE MANAGERS, LP

    Publication Date: 2003-12-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    This is an action for breach of contract brought by Urban Box Office Network, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "UBO") against Interfase Managers, L.P., various other business entities, Scott J. Hyten, and DOES

  • April 20, 2000 | The American Lawyer

    Market Makers

    Every major U.S. industry, or so it seems, has announced that it is forming an electronic exchange on the Web. General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and DaimlerChrysler Corporation are cr

    1 minute read

  • Anastasoff v. United States

    Publication Date: 2000-08-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-08-22
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: ARNOLD and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and MAGNUSON, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-3917EM

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Faye Anastasoff seeks a refund of overpaid federal income tax. On April 13, 1996