Search Results

Sutherland v. Ernst & Young, 12-304-cv

Publication Date: 2013-08-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Winter, Cabranes, and Straub, CJJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee Stephanie Sutherland: H. Tim Hoffman, Arthur W. Lazear, Ross L. Libenson, Hoffman & Lazear, Oakland, CA, on the brief, Max Folkenflik, Folkenflik & McGerity, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Ernst & Young LLP.: Gregory W. Knopp, Katharine J. Galston, Daniel L. Nash, on the brief, Rex S. Heinke, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA and Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: P. David Lopez, Lorraine C. Davis, Daniel T. Vail, Paul D. Ramshaw, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae United States Department of Labor: M. Patricia Smith, Steven J. Mandel, Paul L. Frieden, Edward D. Sieger, Dean A. Romhilt, United States Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association, the National Employment Law Project, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy: Dan C. Getman, Michael J.D. Sweeney, Lesley Tse, Getman & Sweeney PLLC, New Paltz, NY, Rebecca M. Hamburg, National Employment Lawyers Association, San Francisco, CA.
Case Number: 12-304-cv

Cite as: Sutherland v. Ernst & Young, 12-304-cv, NYLJ 1202614855952, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 9, 2013) 12-304-cv Before: Winter, Cabrane

August 23, 1999 | Legal Times

Clinton's Legal Eagles Eyeing Exits and Offers

WASHINGTON -- Some of the most sought-after lawyers in Washington, D.C., won't be bringing rosters of loyal clients with them to their new firms.Instead, with the Clinton administration ente

1 minute read

May 10, 1999 | National Law Journal

Health Law Boom

When attorney General Janet Reno announced in 1993 that the Department of Justice was making health care fraud its top priority after violent crime, she triggered a mini-revolution. At many

1 minute read

Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP, 12-304-cv

Publication Date: 2013-09-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Winter, Cabranes, and Straub, C.JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee Stephanie Sutherland: H. Tim Hoffman, Arthur W. Lazear, Ross L. Libenson, Hoffman & Lazear, Oakland, CA, on the brief, Max Folkenflik, Folkenflik & McGerity, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Ernst & Young LLP: Gregory W. Knopp, Katharine J. Galston, Daniel L. Nash, on the brief, Rex S. Heinke, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA and Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: P. David Lopez, Lorraine C. Davis, Daniel T. Vail, Paul D. Ramshaw, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae United States Department of Labor: M. Patricia Smith, Steven J. Mandel, Paul L. Frieden, Edward D. Sieger, Dean A. Romhilt, United States Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association, the National Employment Law Project, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy: Dan C. Getman, Michael J.D. Sweeney, Lesley Tse, Getman & Sweeney PLLC, New Paltz, NY; Rebecca M. Hamburg, National Employment Lawyers Association, San Francisco, CA.
Case Number: 12-304-cv

Cite as: Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP, 12-304-cv, NYLJ 1202617602394, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 9, 2013) 12-304-cv Before: Winter, Cab

July 2, 2007 | The Associated Press

Supreme Court Reaches Pro-Business Consensus on Commercial Issues

The narrow split between liberal and conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices was evident throughout the Court's most recent term with one prominent exception: business cases. Unlike the

1 minute read

February 1, 2010 | The American Lawyer

The 2010 Lateral Report Buyer's Market

By most measures, 2009 was a dismal year for the legal industry. One notable exception to the drumbeat of record layoffs and bankruptcy actions: By our count, there were also a record number of lat

1 minute read

Chloé, A Division of Richemont North America, Inc., Chloé, S.A.—Plaintiffs-Appellants, ABC—Plaintiff, v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, Llc, Rebecca Rushing, also known as Rebecca Grelier, Mohamad Alexander Zarafshan, also anown as Alexander Zar, Jennifer Suns, Sun­eye Productions, Inc. Def, 2-20 John Does—Defendants, Simone Ubaldelli—Defendant-Appellee, Docket No.: 09-3361-cv

Publication Date: 2010-08-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Raggi And Hall, Circuit Judges, and Carman, Judge*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Milton Springut (Tal S. Benschar, on the brief), Kalow & Springut, L.L.P., New York, New York, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Chloé, et al.
for defendant: Michael Konopka, ESQ., New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee Simone Ubaldelli.
Case Number: Docket No.: 09-3361-cv

Cite as: Chloé v. Queen Bee, 09-3361-cv, NYLJ 1202464350736, at *1 (2nd Circuit, August 5, 2010)Before: Raggi And Hall, Circuit Judges, and Carman, Judge*p c

United States,v.,Whitten,07-1320-crDecided: June 30, 2010

Publication Date: 2010-07-06
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Unknown
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 07-1320-cr

United States v. Whitten Before: Jacobs, Ch.J., Miner, and Livingston, C.JJ. Decided: June 30, 2010 Beverly Van Ness, New York, New York; Barry J. Fisher, Sa

September 6, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Merrill Lych & Co. Inc. plaintiffs v. Allegheny Energy Inc., defendants

Decided Aug. 31, 2007Before Cardamone, Walker, and Raggi, C.JJ.Allegheny Energy, Inc. and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC appeal the judgment entered August 26, 2005 in the Un

1 minute read

Tibble v. Edison International

Publication Date: 2013-08-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2013-03-21
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, and Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Wolff, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the briefs were Jerome J. Schlichter, Nelson G. Wolff, and Jason P. Kelly, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, MO. Elizabeth Hopkins, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Secretary of Labor as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were Stacey E. Elias, M. Patricia Smith, and Timothy D. Hauser. Jay E. Sushelsky, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, DC, filed the brief for the AARP as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Melvin Radowitz, AARP, Washington, D.C.
for defendant: Jonathan D. Hacker, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the defendants-­appellees/cross-appellants. With him on the briefs were Walter Dellinger, Robert N. Eccles, Gary S. Tell, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., as well as Matthew Eastus, and China Rosas, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Nicole A. Diller, Alison B. Willard, and Abbey M. Glenn, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA, filed the brief for the California Employment Law Council as amicus curiae in support of defendants-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas L. Cubbage III, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, filed the brief for the Investment Company Institute as amicus curiae in support of defendants-­appellees/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was S. Michael Chittenden, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC.
Case Number: No. 10-56406 No. 10-56415

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8241 GLENN TIBBLE; WILLIAM BAUER; WILLIAM IZRAL; HENRY RUNOWIECKI; FREDERICK SUHADOLC; HUGH TINMAN, JR., as representatives of a c