Filter This View

  • February 27, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2004-2007 Report of the Supreme Court Committee on the Rules of Evidence

    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. RULE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION A. Proposed Amendments to the Hearsay Rule in Light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354,

    1 minute read

  • Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Sutton, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 08-4015/4016

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: November 18, 2009Before: MARTIN and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; REEVES, District Judge.*

  • In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293

    Publication Date: 2012-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Jason Allen Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Steve W. Berman, George W. Sampson, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Seattle), Seattle, WA. Jeff D. Friedman, Shana Scarlett, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (CA), Berkely, CA. Kit A. Pierson, Emmy L. Levens, Jeffrey B. Dubner, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (DC), Washington, DC. John Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant Apple, Inc.: Daniel S. Floyd, Daniel G. Swanson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA. For Defendant HarperCollins Publishers LLC: Shepard Goldfein, Clifford H. Aronson, Paul M. Eckles, C. Scott Lent, Matthew M. Martino, Skadden, Armps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants Hachette Book Group, Inc. and Hachette Digital, Inc.: Walter B. Stuart, Samuel J. Rubin, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan: Joel M. Mitnick, Alexandra Shear, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant Penguin Group (USA), Inc.: Daniel Ferrel McInnis, David A. Donohoe, Allison Sheedy, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C. For Defendants Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.: James W. Quinn, Yehudah L. Buchweitz, Weil, Gotshal, & Manges LLP, New York, NY. Helene D. Jaffee, Proskauer Rose LLP, Eleven Times Square, New York, NY. Martha E. Gifford, Law Office of Martha E. Gifford, Brooklyn, NY. *1
    Case Number: 11 MD 2293

    Cite as: In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293, NYLJ 1202554340567, at *1 (SDNY, Decided May 15, 2012)District Judge Denise Cotep

  • January 26, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Automobile Injury 2003: Digests of Unpublished Decisions

    1. Thompson v. Dominguez, A-2837-01T3 DDS No. 23-2-2496 Judges Fall and WeissbardJan. 8, 2003No specific type; AICRA case.Plaintiff was involved in two separate

    1 minute read

  • July 1, 2009 | Focus Europe

    Arbitration Scorecard: Contracts

    AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY: $28 billion (including $9 billion counterclaim) DISPUTE: OJSC Yukos Oil Company (Russian Federation) v. Kravin Investments Ltd., White P

    1 minute read

  • F.L. v. New York City Department of Education

    Publication Date: 2012-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge* Richard Eaton
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-Civ-5131 (RKE)

    Cite as: F.L. v. New York City Department of Education, 11-Civ-5131 (RKE), NYLJ 1202581743751, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 16, 2012)District Judge*

  • Alameda County Flood Control, etc. v. Department Of Water Resources

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-15
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, John S. Poulos, Amy L. Pierce, Darcy L. Muilenburg; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Greg L. Johnson; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard and Edward J. Tiedemann, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 7, Alameda County Water District, City of Yuba City, County of Butte, County of Kings, Empire West Side Irrigation District, Kern County Water Agency, Napa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Oak Flat Water District, Plumas County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Santa Clara Valley Water District, Solano County Water Agency, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District. Amelia T. Minaberrigarai, for Plaintiff and Appellant Kern County Water Agency.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Denise Ferkich Hoffman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Matthew J. Goldman and Vera Sandronsky, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent, State of California, Department of Water Resources. Bingham McCutchen LLP, James J. Dragna, Colin C. West and Thomas S. Hixson, for Defendants, Interveners and Appellants Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Castaic Lake Water Agency, Central Coast Water Authority, Coachella Valley Water District, Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, Desert Water Agency, Littlerock Creek Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Mojave Water Agency, Palmdale Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and United Water Conservation District. Best Best & Krieger LLP and Robert M. Sawyer, for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, Ventura County Watershed Protection District. Marcia L. Scully, John Schlotterbeck, Heather C. Beatty and Karen L. Tachiki for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
    Case Number: No. C065522

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1904ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, ETC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.DEPARTMENT

  • Messerschmidt v. Millender

    Publication Date: 2012-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10–704

      CURT MESSERSCHMIDT, et al., PETITIONERS v. BRENDA MILLENDER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF AU

  • December 17, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES BANKING — NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS 06-2-0362 span style="

    1 minute read

  • June 18, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    June 10 to 16, 2010 STATE COURT CASES ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION 03-2-8205 Dhall v. 700 Grove Street Urban Renewal, L.L.C. , App. Div. (per curiam) (11 pp.) The orders

    1 minute read