Filter This View

  • United States of America v. Jose Luis Guzman Sanchez

    Publication Date: 2011-10-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-09-22
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-1133-cr

    United States v. SanchezSUMMARY ORDERRulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed b

  • Karl Ahlers v. Steven Rabinowitz, Director, Manhattan Psychiatric Center

    Publication Date: 2012-04-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-06
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Dennis Jacobs, Chief Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-1193

    10-1193-CVAhlers v. Rabinowitz(Argued: December 7, 2011Before: JACOBS, Chief Judge, CABRANES and WESLEY,Circuit Judges.Plaintiff appeals from a judgment ent

  • Genger v. Genger

    Publication Date: 2013-07-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS Part 12
    Judge: Justice Barbara Jaffe
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 109749/09

    Cite as: Genger v. Genger, 109749/09, NYLJ 1202610278609, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided May 29, 2013) 109749/09 Justice Barbara

  • Lopez v. Ryan

    Publication Date: 2012-05-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: GRABER, McKEOWN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly J. Henry, AFPD-Capital Habeas Federal Public Defender?s Office, Nashville, Tennesse, for Appellant-Petitioner.
    for defendant: Susanne Bartlett Blomo, Arizona Attorney General?s Office, Phoenix, Arizona, for Respondents-Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 12-99001

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 5237 SAMUEL VILLEGAS LOPEZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN; RON CREDIO, W

  • June 3, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    White-Collar Crime

    For the criminal justice system to work effectively, communication between the prosecution and the defense is important. Defense attorneys constantly consider whether to provide informat

    1 minute read

  • Ameron International Corporation v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania

    Publication Date: 2010-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-18
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanzler Funderburk & Castellon and Jordan S. Stanzler for Plaintiff and Appellant. Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish and Richard Giller for The California Cast Metals Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: McCurdy & Fuller, Kevin G. McGurdy and Rosemary J. Springer for Defendant and Respondent Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Hinshaw & Culbertson, Robert J. Romero, Paul E. Vallone and Joseph J. De Hope, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents Century Indemnity Company, Insurance Company of North America, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Harbor Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company.. Charlston, Revich & Chamberlin, Charlston, Revich & Wollitz, Ira Revich and Nicholas R. Andrea for Defendants and Respondents International Insurance Company and Puritan Insurance Company. Burnham Brown, Thomas M. Downey, Tyler G. Olpin and James Y. Higa for Defendants and Respondents Transcontinental Insurance Company and Harbor Insurance Company. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom and Andrew P. Sclar for Defendant and Respondent Old Republic Insurance Company. Hogan & Hartson, David R. Singer, Jonathan S. Franklin, William J. Bowman and Catherine E. Stetson for Defendant and Respondent Twin City Fire Insurance Company. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, Michael A. Barnes, Sonia Martin and Lee L. Kaster for Defendant and Respondent Great American Surplus Lines Insurance Company. O?Melveny & Myers, Richard B. Goetz and A. Patricia Klemic for Defendants and Respondents Insurance Company of North America and Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Foley & Lardner, Eileen R. Ridley and Patrick T. Wong for Lloyd?s and The Reinsurance Association of America as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Wiley Rein, Laura A. Foggan; Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Randolph P. Sinnott and John J. Moura for Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Blaise S. Curet and Stephen R. Wong for Zurich American Insurance Company as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S153852

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14403AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE

  • October 7, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    How Much Is a Patent Infringement Worth?

    Recently, calculations of patent damages have fallen under considerable scrutiny, resulting in the end of an era of fundamental assumptions. Upon establishing patent infringement, a patent o

    1 minute read

  • Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2012-05-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-1472

    KOUICHI TANIGUCHI, Petitioner v. KAN PACIFIC SAIPAN, LTD., DBA MARIANAS RESORT AND SPA No. 10-1472 p c

  • September 27, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Kosiba v. Merck & Co. et al

    U.S. Third Circuit No. 02-2668; Third Circuit; opinion by Becker, U.S.C.J.; filed September 13, 2004. Before Judges Ambro, Becker and Greenberg. On appeal from the District of

    1 minute read

  • September 16, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Copyright Law

    On July 22, 2005, in Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.,1 Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision noteworthy for it

    1 minute read