Filter This View

  • Gila River Indian Community v. United States

    Publication Date: 2013-07-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Before: M. Margaret McKeown, N. Randy Smith, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen,* Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patricia A. Millett (argued), Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C. for Plaintiff-Appellant Gila River Indian Community; Catherine E. Stetson (argued), Hogan Lovells, Washington, D.C. for Plaintiff-Appellant City of Glendale; David R. Cole (argued), Dep. State Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Arizona, for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant State of Arizona.
    for defendant: Aaron P. Avila (argued), Dep't of Just., Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees the United States of America, et. al.; Seth P. Waxman (argued), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor­Appellee the Tohono O'odham Nation.
    Case Number: No. 11-15631

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7223 GILA R

  • May 18, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    A Gateway to India?

    Ronald Panitch has fielded his share of cold-call pitches from vendors during his 40 years of practicing intellectual property law. But one he received last week included an eye-opening busine

    1 minute read

  • April 21, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    In Brief

    A Matter of TrustWhen the public was polled about the professionals they trust the most, lawyers didn't rank No. 1 -- they came in at No. 14, right behind building contractors a

    1 minute read

  • February 5, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

    Shareholder Sues Baron & Budd Over Contract

    If there's one thing Russell Budd doesn't appear to need right now, it's a suit filed by a disgruntled Baron & Budd shareholder over a compensation agreement. Budd, the majority sh

    1 minute read

  • Gregory v. First Title of America, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-01-27
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-10737

    [PUBLISH]Before BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*fn1 District Judge.Appellant Nelda Gregory ("Gregory") appeals from an order entered on 14 Januar

  • May 1, 1999 | The American Lawyer

    The Handbag Wars

    A tense, court-imposed cease-fire seemed to be holding between Gucci Group N.V. and LVMH Mo't Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. in mid-March. After LVMH, the French luxury goods house, had snatched up 34

    1 minute read

  • Wanetick v. Gateway Mitsubishi

    Publication Date: 2000-05-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-05-10
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN , VERNIERO, and COLEMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald L. Lueddeke
    for defendant: Kevin M. McKeon
    Case Number: No. A- 106

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J. In this consumer fraud action, the

  • July 29, 2002 | Legal Times

    The Lure of Uncle Sam

    Working for Uncle Sam never looked so good.The federal government, which not long ago struggled to hold on to its attorneys in the face of increasing six-figure law firm salaries, is popular

    1 minute read

  • Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff v. Danny Garber, Defendants, 12 Civ. 9339

    Publication Date: 2013-05-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the Securities and Exchange Commission: Paul G. Gizzi, Esq., Andrew M. Calamari, Esq., Haimavathi V. Marlier, Esq., Michael D. Paley, Esq., U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, N.Y.
    for defendant: For Moving Defendants: Ira Lee Sorkin, Esq., Amit Sondhi, Esq., Lowenstein Sandler PC, New York, N.Y.
    Case Number: 12 Civ. 9339

    Cite as: SEC v. Garber, 12 Civ. 9339, NYLJ 1202598464841, at *1 (SDNY, Decided April 22, 2013)District Judge Shira ScheindlinDecide

  • September 13, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Appellate Division Review

    Ever wondered what the Appellate Division was up to 100 years ago? In 1907, the Appellate Division, Third Department, considered a libel action brought by the manufacturer of "Dr. Williams' Pi

    1 minute read