Filter This View

  • October 28, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Tech-Savvy U.K. Firm Osborne Clarke to Open in New York

    Osborne Clarke, the U.K.'s 35th-largest law firm by revenue, will open its second U.S. outpost next week by launching an off

    1 minute read

  • Yahoo! v. Microsoft, 13 CV 7237

    Publication Date: 2013-10-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, Yahoo! Inc.: Alexander C Drylewski Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Patrick George Rideout Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Robert Alexander Fumerton Skadden, Arps, Slate,Meagher & Flom LLP(IIA), New York, NY.
    for defendant: Counsel for Respondent and Cross-Petitioner, Microsoft Corp.: Richard Scott Goldstein Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (NYC), New York, NY.
    Case Number: 13 CV 7237

    Cite as: Yahoo! v. Microsoft, 13 CV 7237, NYLJ 1202624991930, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 21, 2013) 13 CV 7237 District Judge Robert Patters

  • October 28, 2013 | National Law Journal

    D. C. Calendar of Events

    TUESDAY , OCT. 29 Ethics: The District of Columbia Affairs section of the District of Columbia Bar presents "The Firs

    1 minute read

  • October 25, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Tech-Savvy U.K. Firm Osborne Clarke to Open in New York

    Osborne Clarke, the United Kingdom's 35th-largest law firm by revenue, will open its second U.S. outpost next week by launch

    1 minute read

  • October 24, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Free Expression and Privacy: A Delicate Balance

    Two recent cases, separated by an ocean and governed by somewhat disparate American and European concepts, nonetheless have found common ground in the balance between free expression and priv

    1 minute read

  • October 21, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Associates Class of 2013

    Things just keep looking up for associate hiring at New Jersey’s larger firms. Since 2010, there’s been a steady rise in staffing rates, and it continued this year. Though weR

    1 minute read

  • October 17, 2013 |

    How to Purchase “Cyber” Insurance

    Roberta D. Anderson, a partner in the Pittsburgh office of K&L Gates LLP, concentrates her practice in insurance coverage litigation and counseling.…

    1 minute read

  • Time Warner Cable Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 11-4138

    Publication Date: 2013-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Chin and Carney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Time Warner Cable Inc., Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum, Jeff Zimmerman, Time Warner Cable Inc., New York, New York; Richard P. Press, Matthew A. Brill, Amanda E. Potter, Matthew T. Murchison, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; Landis C. Best, Ari Melber, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, New York, New York, on the brief, Floyd Abrams, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, New York, N.Y. For Petitioner: National Cable & Telecommunications Association., Rick Chessen, Neal M. Goldberg, Michael S. Schooler, Diane B. Burstein, National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Washington, D.C.; Cynthia E. Richman, Scott P. Martin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.; Howard J. Symons, Tara M. Corvo, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Washington, D.C., on the brief, Miguel A. Estrada, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For Respondents: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America., Joseph F. Wayland, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Nancy C. Garrison, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Sean A. Lev, General Counsel, Jacob M. Lewis, Associate General Counsel, James M. Carr, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., on the brief, Peter Karanjia, Deputy General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. For Amicus Curiae Bloomberg L.P.: Stephen Díaz Gavin, Andrew M. Friedman, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C. For Amicus Curiae the National Association of Broadcasters.: Erin L. Dozier, Jane E. Mago, Jerianne Timmerman, The National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, D.C. For Amicus Curiae Public Knowledge.: Harold Feld, Senior Vice President, Sherwin Siy, Vice President, Legal Affairs, Public Knowledge, Washington, D.C. For Amici Curiae The Tennis Channel, Inc. & NFL Enterprises LLC.: C. William Phillips, Covington & Burling LLP, New York, New York; Stephen A. Weiswasser, Kurt A. Wimmer, Gerard J. Waldron, Neema D. Trivedi, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 11-4138

    Cite as: Time Warner Cable Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 11-4138, NYLJ 1202618182786, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 4, 2013) 11-4

  • August 30, 2013 |

    Quiz: Test your knowledge of August's top legal news

    Recapping the most significant--or just plain strangest--news stories of the past month

    1 minute read

  • August 22, 2013 | FC&S Insurance

    Data Breaches and the General Liability Policy in a Cyber-World

    The authors explain the foundations for a claim under a commercial general liability insurance policy for data breach and provide a sampling of the types…

    1 minute read