• October 31, 2005 |

    Nestle Catches A Break With Kit Kat Trademark

    European Court Allows Trademark Owners To Protect Partial Slogans

    1 minute read

  • Chhina Family Partnership LP v. S.K. Group of Motels Inc.

    Publication Date: 2005-10-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael C. Hall, Albany, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Ben B. Mills Jr. Mills & Chasteen PC, Fitzgerald, for appellee.

    Case Number: A05A0926

    Merger clause in a sales contract for the purchase of a motel did not defeat the buyer's fraud claim, since the buyer based that claim on misrepresentations contained in the contract i

  • Williams v. Chick-fil-A Inc.

    Publication Date: 2005-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James M. Thompson and Larry I. Smith Thompson & Smith PC, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Ashley F. Cummings, Matthew J. Calvert Hunton & Williams, Atlanta, and William T. Casey Jr. Hicks, Casey & Barber PC, Marietta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A05A0105

    There was no evidence showing that the corporate defendant and the operator of one of its restaurants were in a joint venture or other agency relationship at the time the operator ran a stop sign in

  • Buckner v. Douglas County

    Publication Date: 2005-07-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Kevin Moore Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul B. Frickey and Dana K. Maine Freeman, Mathis & Gary, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A05A0881

    The Board of Commissioner's letter to the plaintiff agreeing to allow him to develop property in accordance with prior zoning amounted to an agreement to amend the county's zoning ordinance in viola

  • Folsom v. City of Jasper

    Publication Date: 2005-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Fletcher, Norman S.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven K. Leibel and Guy H. Weiss Casey Gilson Leibel PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Will H. Pickett Jr. Pickett, Pickett & Pickett PC, Jasper, for appellees.

    Case Number: S05A0021

    The city of Jasper's Alcoholic Beverages Ordinance contains a blanket prohibition against truthful, non-misleading speech about a lawful product in violation of the First Amen

  • City of Atlanta v. Corey Entertainment Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Fletcher, Norman S.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Linda K. DiSantis, City Attorney, Jerolyn W. Ferrari and Stacy Y. Cole, Atlanta, for the city of Atlanta. Judson H. Simmons, William V. Hearnburg Jr. Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Atlanta, for Barbara Fouch d/b/a Creative Media Displays of Ga. Michael J. Bowers, J. Matthew Maguire Jr., Alexandra E. Chopin Balch & Bingham LLP, Gregory H. Worthy, John W. Harbin and Roger B. Hatcher Jr. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy LLP, Atlanta, for Corey Entertainment Inc. and others.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: S04A0932; S04A0934

    The appellee had the right, under the Open Records Act, to disclosure of the appellant's tax returns, which were used to qualify her for certification as a Disadvantaged Business Enter

  • Hammond v. Carnett's Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ned Blumenthal Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco PC, Marc B. Hershovitz, Michael K. Jablonski, Atlanta, Roy E. Barnes and John F. Salter Jr., Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Richard C. Foster Hicks, Casey & Barber PC, Marietta, for appellee. Other party representation: Robert B. Hocutt, Mark D. Lefkow Nall & Miller LLP, Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Sidney R. Barrett Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel S. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta.

    Case Number: A03A2487

    The trial court abused its discretion in finding that the plaintiff failed to satisfy the numerosity, commonality, typicality and superiority requirements for class certification in her action broug

  • Mid-Georgia Envtl. Management Group LLLP v. Meriwether County

    Publication Date: 2004-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Fletcher, Norman S.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James L. Paul, Matthew J. McCoyd Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Atlanta, Steven M. Fincher and Murray J. Weed Fincher & Hecht LLC, Jonesboro, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel W. Lee, LaGrange, Dana K. Maine, Kelley R. Purdie Freeman, Mathis & Gary LLP, Atlanta, and Thomas H. Morton Morton, Morton & Assocs. LLC, Zebulon for appellees.

    Case Number: S03A1487

    The county could not be compelled to grant approval for the plaintiff to build a solid waste landfill on 240 acres of county property that was not zoned for landfil

  • Union County v. CGP Inc.

    Publication Date: 2003-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Benham, Robert
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dana K. Maine and Paul B. Frickey Freeman, Mathis & Gary LLP, Atlanta, for Union County. John W. Harbin, Simon H. Bloom and Bryan E. Busch Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, for CGP Inc.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: S03A0669; S03X0670

    A county's flood ordinances are not subject to municipal zoning regulations since they apply to all property in county subject to specified physical phenomenon-periodic flooding in this

  • Pabey v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael B. Perry, St. Marys, for appellant.
    for defendant: Stephen D. Kelly, District Attorney, and Jacquelyn L. Johnson, Assistant District Attorney, Brunswick, for appellee.

    Case Number: A03A0299

    The defendant was entitled to summary judgment in the civil forfeiture action brought against her under the RICO statute because the state's evidence was insuffi