Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
35,135 results for '*///////////////////////// industry:"Advertising"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
November 29, 2022 | Law.com
Lawsuits by firms including Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman and Levin Sedran & Berman cite independent laboratory testing that found the actual protein levels in some of Beyond Meat's products are 20% less than advertised.
3 minute read
November 29, 2022 | The Recorder
"The indisputable science now shows that Beyond Meat was built on and has grown because of deception and lies," Don Lee Farms attorney John Hueston, of Hueston Hennigan in Newport Beach, California, wrote in one lawsuit.
3 minute read
November 29, 2022 | Daily Report Online
"Google tried to take shortcuts in advertising its products, and now it's paying the price," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said. "Asking DJs to share personal experiences about a product they had not used is misleading—and a violation of state consumer protection laws."
2 minute read
November 29, 2022 | Litigation Daily
With a two-week cycle of Litigator of the Week landing on Friday, let's give this bonus batch of shout-out-worthy litigation results a moment to shine.
5 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-11-29
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen L. Pascale, Robert M. Vrana, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian S. Seal, Thomas G. Southard, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Cameron P. Clark, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Sacksteder Fenwick & West LLP, San Francisco, CA; Geoffrey Miller, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA; Michael Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen R. Smith, Samuel Whitt, Cooler LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: 18-836-RGA
Court relied upon extrinsic evidence to understand how person of ordinary skill in the art would construe patent terms in dispute in claim construction.
Publication Date: 2022-11-29
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: DOCKET
Handdown List released on: November 23, 2022
November 28, 2022 | New York Law Journal
A full-time criminal court judge who presides in a problem-solving court and makes referrals to a not-for-profit entity may observe the entity's programming for individuals who have completed all court mandates but voluntarily return to the agency for additional services.
8 minute read
November 28, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer
A Pennsylvania woman's negligence claim over a zip lining injury will return to trial court after the state's Superior Court determined summary judgment was improperly awarded to the defendant ski resort.
5 minute read
November 28, 2022 | The Recorder
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
1 minute read
November 28, 2022 | Pro Mid Market
"In order to do a good job of connecting with people in general, you need to share something about yourself," said Sunstein managing partner Kerry Timbers. "You need to decide what to share and how vulnerable to be and how to really be yourself, your authentic self, while still navigating all of the issues that bias injects into every interaction that we have."
9 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
