• May 3, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Lawyer Ethics Guided By Core Principles

    Our constitutional democracy flourishes when our society continues to believe in the rule of law and the viability of its judicial system. As attorneys, we play a vital role in fostering trust and

    1 minute read

  • May 8, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    Spanx v. SPANK: Fighting Over a Trademark on a Tush

    The makers of abbreviated and abbreviating undergarments for women are duking it out over -- ahem -- an abbreviation. The plaintiff is Spanx Inc., the Atlanta creator of elasticized, slimmi

    1 minute read

  • May 9, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    Spanx, SPANK Embroiled in Fight Over Lingerie Trademark

    The makers of abbreviated and abbreviating undergarments for women are duking it out over — ahem — an abbreviation. The plaintiff is Spanx Inc., the Atl

    1 minute read

  • May 25, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Blocks Similar Names for Cholesterol Drugs

    In a trademark dispute over similar-sounding brand names for cholesterol drugs, a federal appeals court has rejected the novel argument that an injunction was needed to prevent the "serious he

    1 minute read

  • September 3, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Divided Circuit Reinstates City's RICO Allegation Of Tax Loss From the Internet Sale of Cigarettes

    A split federal appeals panel has reinstated part of New York City's case claiming online cigarette sellers are guilty of racketeering by skirting a law requiring the reporting of cigare

    1 minute read

  • Roberts v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-24
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lynch, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-1045

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Souter, *fn1 Associate Justice, and Selya, Circuit Judge.Jocelyn Roberts, a flight attendant, was injured while working on a March 6, 20

  • December 1, 2011 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    United Technologies Goodrich United Technologies Corporation agreed to pay $18.4 billion for Goodrich Corporation on September 21. The deal would be the largest eve

    1 minute read

  • March 27, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Antitrust

    The House of Lords decided that a British citizen indicted for criminal antitrust violations in the United States should not be extradited because price fixing was not a crime in the United Ki

    1 minute read

  • July 15, 2002 | Daily Report Online

    Justices Split on Dram Shops, Roswell Billboard Feud

    Jonathan Ringel [email protected] Bartenders and others who serve alcohol may need to be more careful to avoid liability-or at least a trial-if their guests become drunk

    1 minute read

  • Tibble v. Edison International

    Publication Date: 2013-03-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-21
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, and Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Wolff (argued), Jerome J. Schlichter, Nelson G. Wolff, and Jason P. Kelly, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, St. Louis, Missouri, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Jonathan D. Hacker (argued), Walter Dellinger, Robert N. Eccles, and Gary S. Tell, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C.; Matthew Eastus and China Rosas, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Elizabeth Hopkins (argued), Stacey E. Elias, M. Patricia Smith, and Timothy D. Hauser, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Secretary of Labor. Jay E. Sushelsky and Melvin Radowitz, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae AARP. Nicole A. Diller, Alison B. Willard, and Abbey M. Glenn, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae California Employment Law Council. Thomas L. Cubbage III, and S. Michael Chittenden, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Investment Company Institute.

    Case Number: No. 10-56406

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3138GLENN TI