Filter This View

  • Lair v. Bullock

    Publication Date: 2012-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Charles C. Lovell, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James Bopp, Jr., Jeffrey Gallant, and Anita Y. Woudenberg, The Bopp Law Firm, PC, Terre Haute, Indiana, for plaintiffs-appellees.
    for defendant: Michael G. Black and Andrew I. Huff, Assistant Attorneys General, Montana Department of Justice, Helena, Montana, for defendants-appellants.
    Case Number: No. 12-35809

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11705DOUG LAIR; STEVE DOGIAKOS; AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP; AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP PAC; MONTANA RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION

  • Larson Manufacturing Company of South Dakota, Inc. v. Aluminart Products Limited

    Publication Date: 2009-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-18
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Schall, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for plaintiff-appellant: Charles De La Garza, Charles De La Garza & Associates, Austin.
    for defendant: Attorney for defendants-cross appellants: Alan Kowalchyk, Merchant & Gould, Minneapolis.
    Case Number: Nos. 2008-1096 & -1174

    Before SCHALL, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge LINN.This is a patent case. Larson Manufacturing

  • September 15, 2003 | Legal Times

    We've Been There, Done That (Part 2)

    Sept. 28, 1987WITH $62M, COVINGTON LEADS IN REVENUESThe D.C. offices of two New York megafirms � Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Mea

    1 minute read

  • November 23, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Motorola Credit Corporation v. Uzan

    Decided October 22, 2004Before Miner, Calabresi, and Cabranes, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakof

    1 minute read

  • People v. Michael Forde and Martin Devereaux

    Publication Date: 2005-05-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Atlas The defendants, convicted after trial of Bribe Receiving by a Labor Union Official, have filed two motions to set aside the

  • February 21, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES - LICENSURE 47-2-9701 In the Matter of the Application for Relief, etc.; Billy's Sports Bar, Inc., App. Div. (per curiam) (13 pp.)

    1 minute read

  • June 2, 2008 | National Law Journal

    The 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America

    First, a reality check: At last count, a mere 5.4 percent of partners at U.S. law firms were members of minority groups. For women of color, the figure was fewer than 1.7 percent, according to

    1 minute read

  • USA v. Lawrence Dicristina, 11-CR-414

    Publication Date: 2012-08-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Jack B. Weinstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the government By: Marisa M. Seifan, Nathan Daniel Reilly, Office of the United States Attorney, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: For the defendant: Kannan Sundaram, Federal Defenders, Brooklyn, NY. For amicus curiae Poker Players Alliance By: Thomas C. Goldstein, Tejinder Singh, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Kenneth M. Dreifach, ZwillGen, PLLC, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 11-CR-414

    Cite as: USA v. Lawrence Dicristina, 11-CR-414, NYLJ 1202568480608, at *1 (EDNY, Decided August 21, 2012)District Judge Jack B. Wei

  • Elite Licensing Inc. v. Thomas Plastics Inc.

    Publication Date: 2003-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Scheindlin ELITE LICENSING, INC. v. THOMAS PLASTICS, INC. — This is an action for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,813,569 (“the ‘569 Patent”) for a

  • October 28, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Recoveries of $1 Million and Above

    Case, Date Resolved, Claim

    1 minute read