Filter This View

  • September 11, 1996 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 4, No. 176 -- September 11, 1996

    Vol. 4, No. 176 -- September 11, 1996STATE COURT CASESADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE01-2-9989 The City of Gloucester City, et al. v. State, Administrative Office of the Courts,

    1 minute read

  • September 16, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Corporate Disclosure: The Twitter Effect

    On May 7, 2009, the New York Stock Exchange implemented new rules allowing for the use of corporate Web sites as a primary vehicle for disseminating material company information. Coming several yea

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    Making Partner Gets Tougher

    Just as Mario Garcia-Serra expected when he started as an associate at Greenberg Traurig, he worked hard and got promoted a little more than eight years later. But his recent promotion was n

    1 minute read

  • December 1, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    The Churn

    While the unemployment rate hovers near 10 percent and the U.S. economy struggles to right itself, it's no surprise that firms are leaning on their most reliable ­practice areas. This mont

    1 minute read

  • December 17, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES BANKING — NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS 06-2-0362 span style="

    1 minute read

  • July 16, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    July 8 to 14, 2010 STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — HEALTH BENEFITS 01-2-8593 In the Matter of H.S. , App. Div. (per curiam) (8 pp.) H.S. appeals from

    1 minute read

  • Arizona v. United States

    Publication Date: 2012-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-25
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-182

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7095 ARIZONA, ET AL., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES No. 11

  • Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District

    Publication Date: 2012-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-24
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad, Richard J. Schwab, Lawrence B. Trygstad, Daniel�J. Kolodziej and Lillian Kae, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, James Baca, Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia, and Heather A. Dozier, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B231787

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 960 ARI MARKEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRIC

  • July 15, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES AGENCY AND PARTNERSHIP 02-2-2823 Taylor v. Taylor, App. Div. (per curiam) (15 pp.) Plaintiff

    1 minute read

  • October 24, 2000 | Law.com

    WIPO Administrative Panel Decision in 'Corinthians.com' Dispute

    WIPO Arbitration and Mediation CenterADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISIONCorinthians Licenciamentos LTDA v. David Sallen, Sallen Enterprises, and J. D. Sallen Enterprise

    1 minute read