• Alliance for Property Rights and Fiscal Responsibility v. City of Idaho Falls

    Publication Date: 2014-01-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-31
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Sidney R. Thomas, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brent L. Whiting (argued), Richard A. Hearn, and Eric Lynn Olsen, Racine Olson Nye Budge & Bailey, Idaho Falls, Idaho, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    for defendant: Joshua Evett (argued) and Matthew C. Parks, Elam & Burke, Boise, Idaho, for Defendants-Appellants.

    Case Number: No. 12-35800

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 47 ALLIANCE FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY; BRYON REED; CARL TAYLOR; LINDA TAYLOR; HAROLD CARLSON; RITA CARLSON; JE

  • ACLU v. Clapper, 13 Civ. 3994 (WHP)

    Publication Date: 2013-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley III
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel of Record: Jameel Jaffer, Esq., Alex A. Abdo, Esq., Brett M. Kaufman, Esq., Patrick C. Toomey, Esq., Catherine N. Crump, Esq., American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Arthur N. Eisenberg, Esq., Christopher T. Dunn, Esq., New York Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY. Counsel for Plaintiffs: Laura Donohue, Esq., Georgetown Law, Bethesda, MD. Counsel for Defendants: David S. Jones, Esq., Tara M. La Morte, Esq., Christopher B. Harwood, Esq., John D. Clopper, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, S.D.N.Y., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 13 Civ. 3994 (WHP)

    Cite as: ACLU v. Clapper, 13 Civ. 3994 (WHP), NYLJ 1202635183225, at *1 (SDNY, Decided December 27, 2013) 13 Civ. 3994 (WHP) District Judge Willia

  • December 29, 2013 |

    Interstate Bankers Cas. Co. v. Hernandez

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Interstate Bankers Cas. Co.v.Hernandez 2013 IL App (1st) 123035NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN…

    1 minute read

  • December 26, 2013 |

    Midwest Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wolters

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Midwest Family Mut. Ins. Co.v.Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628Supreme Court of Minnesota.MIDWEST FAMILY MUTUAL…

    1 minute read

  • December 26, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Midsized Firms Saw Group Laterals, Leadership Changes

    Whether they were gaining or losing groups of lawyers, undergoing leadership transitions, splitting up or merging, midsized firms across Pennsylvania experienced a number of significant chan

    1 minute read

  • In re: Coudert Brothers LLP, 06-12226 (RDD)

    Publication Date: 2013-12-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District
    Judge: Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: By: David S. Tannenbaum and Karen S. Frieman for Development Specialists, Inc., Stern Tannenbaum & Bell LLP.
    for defendant: By: Edward J.M. Little and Lisa A. Cahill for Statek Corporation., Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.

    Case Number: 06-12226 (RDD)

    Cite as: In re: Coudert Brothers LLP, 06-12226 (RDD), NYLJ 1202634550869, at *1 (Bankruptcy., SD, Decided August 19, 2013) 06-12226 (RDD) Bankrupt

  • December 24, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    For Large Law Firms, 2013 Was a Year of Expansion, Pseudo-Mergers

    For Pennsylvania's large law firms, 2013 was a year of office expansion and pseudo-mergers. While Pennsylvania firms, with the exception of Woodcock Washburn, shied away from the

    1 minute read

  • December 23, 2013 |

    Dry v. United Fire & Cas. Co., Inc.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Dryv.United Fire & Cas. Co., Inc. 2013 WL 3147341Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.NOTICE:…

    1 minute read

  • December 23, 2013 | Texas Lawyer

    Real (Estate) Friendship: Lawyer, Real Estate Exec Credit Comfort and Consistency for Long-Term Partnership

    Carol Burke, a Houston lawyer, and E. R. "Bo" Sanford II, a real estate finance executive, were friends before Sanford hired Burke for legal work, which may be the key reason they&

    1 minute read

  • Sander v. State Bar of California

    Publication Date: 2013-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-19
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, James M. Chadwick, Evgenia N. Fkiaras, David E. Snyder and Guylyn R. Cummins for Plaintiff and Appellant California First Amendment Coalition. Jane Roberta Yakowitz; Bostwick & Jassy, Gary L. Bostwick, Jean-Paul Jassy and Kevin L. Vick for Plaintiffs and Appellants Richard Sander and Joe Hicks.
    for defendant: Kerr & Wagstaffe, James M. Wagstaffe, Michael John Von Loewenfeldt; Starr Babcock, Lawrence C. Yee and Rachel S. Grunberg for Defendants and Respondents. Snell & Wilmer, Mary-Christine Sungaila and Harsh P. Parikh for Multicultural Bar Alliance as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Reed Smith and Dennis Peter Maio for The Bar Association of San Francisco as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Eva Paterson, Allison S. Elgart and Fabián Rentería for Equal Justice Society as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. S194951

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13702 RICHARD SANDER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BAR