Filter This View

  • Beck v. City of Upland

    Publication Date: 2008-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas R. Freeman (argued), Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, & Lincenberg, P.C., Los Angeles, California, and Stephan J. Johnson, Reiss & Johnson, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Samuel J. Wells (argued), Samuel J. Wells, APC, Los Angeles, California, and William K. Hanagami, King & Hanagami, ALC, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellees.
    Case Number: 05-56901

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 6411KENNETH BECK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF UPLAND; CITY OF UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; MARTIN THOUVENELL, City of Upland Police Chief; JEFF MENDENHALL, U

  • Keller v. United States

    Publication Date: 2012-09-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-25
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-41311

    Lyle W. Cayce ClerkUnited States Court of Appeals Fifth CircuitBefore JONES, Chief Judge , and PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.Maude Williams passed away in May 2000,

  • Phillips v. Ornoski

    Publication Date: 2012-03-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Robert E. Coyle, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen Reinhardt, and Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard Phillips, San Quentin, California, appearing pro se; Katherine L. Hart, Fresno, California, advisory counsel, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Catherine Chatman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California; Robert Todd Marshall, Assistant Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.
    Case Number: No. 04-99005

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3098 RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEVEN W. ORNOSKI, Resp

  • October 20, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In-House at Large Public Companies

    table cols="5" xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions" xmlns:k4="http://www.vjoon.com/K4Export/1.4.2" xmlns:ma

    1 minute read

  • March 5, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Federal Circuit Revives Suit over Real Estate Mapping Patent

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has weighed in once again on the elements required for patent holders to prove induced infringement, this time in a fight over online mapping

    1 minute read

  • April 26, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    The Scales Are Tipping Too Far in Favor of 'Smart Growth' Advocates

    The greening of New Jersey is one of Gov. James McGreevey's persistent messages. It is up there with education and the economy in the hierarchy of what matters most to the administration.

    1 minute read

  • Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School District

    Publication Date: 2012-10-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-11
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, Gregory V. Moser, Kendra J. Hall and John C. Lemmo for Plaintiff and Appellant. California Charter Schools Association, Ricardo J. Soto, Phillipa L. Altmann, Julie Ashby Umansky; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, McKenna Long & Aldridge and Charles A. Bird for California Charter Schools Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Los Angeles Unified School District, David R. Holmquist, Mark Fall, Nathan A. Reierson; Strumwasser & Woocher, Gregory G. Luke, Beverly Grossman Palmer and Byron F. Kahr for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. B231164

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11541LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.LOS ANGE

  • Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    Publication Date: 2012-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Thomas R. Freeman, Paul S. Chan; Dakessian Law Firm, Akerman Senterfitt, Reed Smith, Mardiros H. Dakessian; The California Credits Group, LaShelle T. Wilson and Mark Danscecs for Plaintiff and Appellant. Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Krista M. Enns and Linda T. Coberly for California Taxpayers? Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Silverstein & Pomerantz, Amy L. Silverstein and Edwin P. Antolin for Deluxe Corp. as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Gordon Burns, State Deputy Solicitor General, Paul D. Gifford and Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorneys General, W. Dean Freeman, Felix E. Leatherwood, Mark P. Richelson and Ronald N. Ito, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. S173860

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4569 DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendan

  • September 24, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In-House at Large Public Companies

       Company*/d

    1 minute read

  • November 22, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible In-House Counsel, Multijurisdictional Practitioners and Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Pro hac vice attorneys, in-house counsel, and multijurisdictional practitioners attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New Jersey Bar under a number of Court Rule

    1 minute read