Filter This View

  • Kurtin v. Elieff

    Publication Date: 2012-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-27
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Miller Barondness, Louis R. Miller, Daniel S. Miller; Snell & Wilmer, Richard A. Derevan, Todd E. Lundell and Andreea V. Micklis for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Andersen Hilbert & Parker, M. Steven Andersen, Jeffrey N. Garland, Jason L. Satterly; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps; McKenna Long and Aldridge and Charles A. Bird for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. G043999

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7327 TODD KURTIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BRUCE ELIEFF, Defendant and Appella

  • May 13, 2004 |

    New Fictitious Business Name Filings (San Francisco)

    275978Atom Shockwave655 Moultrie St San Francisco CA 94110 275979Health Food Center1024-1026 Grant Ave San Francisco CA 94133 275980Beauty Beauty Ce

    1 minute read

  • Venetoklis Family Ltd. Partnership v Kora Developers, LLC

    Publication Date: 2010-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2009-11468

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P. DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO THOMAS A. DICKERSON LEO

  • October 24, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys, In-House Counsel and Multijurisdictional Practitioners

    Pro hac vice attorneys, in-house counsel, and multijurisdictional practitioners attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New Jersey Bar under a number of Cour

    1 minute read

  • Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis

    Publication Date: 2008-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-19
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For petitioners: C. Christopher Trower, Atlanta.
    for defendant: For respondents: G. Eric Brunstad Jr., Bingham McCutchen, Hartford, Conn.
    Case Number: 06-666

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 4962DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY, et al., PETITIONERS GEORGE W. DAVIS et ux.No. 06666In the Supreme Court of the United States

  • WTC Properties LLC v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2003-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Appellants-insureds, holders of varying property interests in the World Trade Center, appeals judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John S. Martin, Jr

  • March 26, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Topical Index to Articles

    please replace asterisks with bullets (option + 8) ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE * Civil Case Chiefs Seek Review of Best Practices; by Henry Gottlieb, Jan. 22, p. 217. br

    1 minute read

  • Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Corp.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-31
    Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
    Judge: McDONALD, WORK, HUFFMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy D. Cohelan, Isam C. Khoury, Margaret L. Coates, et al.
    for defendant: Ronald C. Redcay, Richard C. Morse, et al.
    Case Number: No. D030628

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.The defendants in this class action lawsuit are companies that refine oil and market gasoline to California

  • July 29, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Taking by Slivers

    Richard Epstein is the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and a Hoover Institution senior fellow.The U.S. Supreme Court,

    1 minute read

  • East Cape May Associates v. State, Department of Environmental Protection

    Publication Date: 2001-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-25
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Havey, P.J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1000-99T5

    As amended September 4, 2001.NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONArgued May 14, 2001This is the second chapter of an inverse condemnation case involving a claim