• Hapner v. Tidwell

    Publication Date: 2010-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy M. Bechtold, BECHTOLD LAW FIRM PLLC, Missoula, Montana, Rebecca Kay Smith, PUBLIC INTEREST DEFENSE CENTER PC, Missoula, Montana, for the appellants.
    for defendant: Brian C. Toth, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., Mark Steger Smith, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY, Billings, Montana, for the appellees. Ronald Walter Opsahl, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, Lakewood, Colorado, for the intervenor-appellee.

    Case Number: No. 09-35896

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12038 SHARON J. HAPNER; NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL; ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. p

  • February 21, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Revenue Growth Might Not Be for Everyone

    Editor's note: This is the second installment in a series looking at law firm revenue tren

    1 minute read

  • Citizens for Police Accountability Political Committee v. Browning

    Publication Date: 2009-07-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-25
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-15115

    PUBLISHBefore DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.This appeal is about voting. Florida Statute § 102.031(4) says that no person may solicit voters "within 100 feet of th

  • Lopez v Adams

    Publication Date: 2010-01-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 506767

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: January 21, 2010 506767 MARGARI

  • Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-26
    Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., BROWN, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David Daar and Jeffrey J. Daar
    for defendant: Ronald J. Nessim et al.

    Case Number: No. S065501

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The trial court below denied certification of this case as a class action. The Court of Appeal affirmed. We granted

  • Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy v. Universal Paragon Corporation

    Publication Date: 2010-08-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-31
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, Nancy L. Fineman and Philip L. Gregory; Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley and Susan H. Handelman for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Daniel M. Kolkey, Kaiponanea T. Matsumura and Gina Moon for Defendants and Appellants.

    Case Number: No. A126149

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11369COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UNIVERSAL PARAGON CORPORA

  • April 2, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Two Ventures, Two Different Kinds of Risk

    Eric Blinderman is a young lawyer with a seriously full plate. A litigation associate at Proskauer Rose, Mr. Blinderman, 30, has put his financial future and his very life on the line with a p

    1 minute read

  • December 21, 1999 | Daily Business Review

    Besieged by Suits

    South Florida businesses big and small are under siege from a handful of litigious advocates for the disabled who are using a bold, sue-'em-all strategy to enforce social change and collect piles o

    1 minute read

  • March 3, 1998 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 6, No. 41 -- March 3, 1998

    STATE COURT CASESCIVIL RIGHTS46-2-4870 Scannell v. Dorf & Dorf, P.C., App. Div. (per curiam) (4 pp.) Court aff

    1 minute read

  • Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. Caescoto

    Publication Date: 2009-06-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-19
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Green
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-0890

    Argued February 5, 2008Employers in Texas generally do not owe a duty to third parties for the tortious activities of off-duty employees occurring off the work site. Loram Maint. of Way, Inc. v. Ia