Search Results

Stimson v. George Laycock Inc.

Publication Date: 2000-12-22
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Smith, George T.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Charles F. Peebles and Lane R. Frostbaum, Norcross, for appellant.
for defendant: . John C. Amabile Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks LLP, Atlanta, for appellant. Other party representation: William M. Akin Akin & Tate LLC, Cartersville, and James C. Clark Jr. Page, Scrantom, Sprouse, Tucker & Ford, Columbus.
Case Number: A00A0953

The homeowners' claims against their builder, arising out of the improper installation of synthetic stucco, were subject to the 6-year statute of limitations for simple written contracts, rather tha

Markowitz v. Wieland

Publication Date: 2000-05-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. McKenney McKenny & Froelich, Robb E. Hellwig and Richard R. Hays Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant:
Case Number: A99A1888, A99A1889

Since plaintiffs chose to affirm a purchase and sale contract which included a merger clause and a disclaimer provision, they could not claim that they relied on the sellers' alleged misrepresenta

Sparks v. The Hosp. Auth. of the City of Bremen and County of Haralson, Ga.

Publication Date: 2000-01-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Pope, Marion T.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas B. Murphy Murphy, Murphy & Garner, Bremen, John H. Parker Jr. and Leo E. Reichert Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Bryan M. Cavan, Seaton D. Purdom and Christopher R. Stovall Gambrell & Stolz LLP, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, J. Thomas Vance and Steven T. Minor Tisinger, Tisinger, Vance & Greer, Carrollton.
Case Number: A99A1146

City/county hospital authority violated the Hospital Acquisition Act by transferring control over nonprofit hospital to a medical center without first disclosing the transaction to the state attorne

November 15, 2012 | National Law Journal

Legal malpractice case revived against Akin Gump

A Texas appeals court has reinstated legal malpractice claims against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld stemming from a troubled hotel deal in San Antonio. In a reversal, the F

1 minute read

November 16, 2012 | National Law Journal

Legal Malpractice Case Revived Against Akin Gump

A Texas appeals court has reinstated legal malpractice claims against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld stemming from a troubled hotel deal in San Antonio. In a reversal, the F

1 minute read

November 18, 2012 | National Law Journal

Legal Malpractice Case Against Akin Gump Revived

A Texas appeals court has reinstated legal malpractice claims against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld stemming from a troubled hotel deal in San Antonio. In a reversal, the F

1 minute read

November 26, 2012 | National Law Journal

Legal Malpractice Case Revived Against Akin Gump

A Texas appeals court has reinstated legal malpractice claims against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld stemming from a troubled hotel deal in San Antonio. In a reversal, the 4th Cour

1 minute read

November 20, 2012 | Texas Lawyer

Firm again faces legal malpractice claims

A Texas appeals court has reinstated legal malpractice claims against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld stemming from a troubled hotel deal in San Antonio. In a reversal, the Fourth D

1 minute read

April 30, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

Big-Tex Firms Post Biggest Overall Revenue Increase in Five Years

(See the 2008 Annual Report on Firm Finance.) Hap

1 minute read

Matter of Carlson v Akin

Publication Date: 2006-09-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 97829

Decided and Entered: September 28, 2006 97829 ________________________________ In the Matter of the Claim of TODD CARLSON, Respondent, v