Filter This View

  • Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-21
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Patrick A. Perry and Nancy�S. Fong for Plaintiff and Appellant. Paskerian Block Martindale & Brinton, Robin C. Martindale and Caleb J. Brinton IV for Rancho Mission Viejo as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Cox, Castle & Nicholson, John S. Miller, Jr. and Dwayne P. McKenzie for California Building Industry Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Vanessa L. Holton, Anthony Mischel and Christopher Jagard for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B218275

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15761AZUSA LAND PARTNERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, D

  • May 2, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    News in Brief

    Trademark Lawyer Laura Miller Joins Akin Gump Saying that she longed for the feel of an intellectual property boutique, trademark and copyright lawyer Laura Miller has decided t

    1 minute read

  • October 30, 2006 | Legal Times

    High Court Asked to Take Kennedy Nephew Case

    Conference Call summarizes the roughly 15 percent of all non-pauper petitions that are the most likely candidates for certiorari. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction is almost entirely d

    1 minute read

  • January 31, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Case Tests Limits of Rule Against Representing Adverse Parties in Related Case

    The state Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether a law firm's brief representation of a party in litigation over construction of a section of the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Transit Sy

    1 minute read

  • May 16, 2011 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Capital Contributions With the Texas economy improving, and the financial position of many large Texas firms on the upswing, now may not be the time for firms to study capital contribution

    1 minute read

  • Castillo v. M. E. K. Construction, Inc.

    Publication Date: 1999-05-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-05-04
    Court: Mississippi Court of Appeals
    Judge: McMILLIN, C.J., DIAZ, J., KING, P.J. AND PAYNE, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald C. Dornan, Jr.
    for defendant: William V. Westbrook III
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.PAYNE, J., FOR THE COURT: Francisca Castillo, individually and as personal representative of her dec

  • Development Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 11 civ. 5994 (CM)

    Publication Date: 2012-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Justice McMahon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11 civ. 5994 (CM)

    Cite as: Development Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 11 civ. 5994 (CM), NYLJ 1202556108178, at *1 (SDNY, Decided May 24, 2012)Justi

  • Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli

    Publication Date: 2008-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-15
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellant: Jonathan Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law, New York.
    for defendant: For appellee: Gregory Garre, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 06-7427

    ON REHEARING EN BANCPUBLISHEDArgued: October 31, 2007Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, MOTZ, TRAXLER, KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Reversed and r

  • September 13, 2010 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Dismissal Sought In a motion filed Sept. 9 with a special court of review, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Presiding Judge Sharon Keller seeks dismissal of the

    1 minute read

  • August 21, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Boutique Firms Clear On Merger Interest: Just Say No

    If you listen to some in the industry predict the future of the legal landscape in the coming years, smaller to medium-sized firms will be something of a relic after consolidation gobbles them

    1 minute read