Filter This View

  • New York Marine and General Insurance Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-15
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Miner, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Docket Nos. 08-5504-cv (L), 09-1104-cv (CON), 09-1139-cv (CON), 09-1149-cv (CON), 09-1153-cv (CON)

    Argued: November 16, 2009Before: MINER and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.*fn2Insured defendant-counter-plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee Lafarge North America, Inc. (

  • May 9, 2007 | Legal Times

    Fire Department Becomes Burning Issue at Supreme Court

    Conference Call summarizes the roughly 15 percent of all non-pauper petitions that are the most likely candidates for certiorari. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction is almost entirely discretionar

    1 minute read

  • March 8, 2004 | Legal Times

    Civil Actions

    The following selected cases were recently filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria divi

    1 minute read

  • July 19, 2001 | The Legal Intelligencer

    When CGL Coverage Includes Trademark Offenses

    Since 1986, nearly all comprehensive general liability insurance policies sold in the United States have included a standard coverage for "advertising injury." The 1986 ISO form, used wi

    1 minute read

  • September 5, 2007 | National Law Journal

    Iraq Contractors Tap Law Firms

    The war in Iraq has an army of high-profile attorneys working to steer defense contractors through a minefield of lawsuits and federal investigations involving war profiteering and fraud. Du

    1 minute read

  • Before: Miner and Straub, C.JJ. NEW YORK MARINE v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC., 08-5504-cv (L); Decided 03/15/10" Anthony J. Pruzinsky, John J. Sullivan, Robert G. Clyne, Hill Rivkins Hayde

    Publication Date: 2010-03-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Before: Miner and Straub, C.JJ. NEW YORK MARINE v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC., 08-5504-cv (L); Decided 03/15/10" Anthony J. Pruzinsky, John J. Sullivan, Robert G. Clyne, Hill Rivkin

  • November 18, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    The Churn: Lateral Moves and Promotions in The Am Law 200

    MARGARET GATTI, who launched Fox Rothschild's Washington, D.C., office in November 2010, has jumped to Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. As a partner in the antitrust group, she will work in the f

    1 minute read

  • August 12, 2013 | National Law Journal

    MOVERS

    PROMOTIONS Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck (Denver): Mitchell Lang­berg has been promoted to office managing partn

    1 minute read

  • Before: Miner and Straub, C.JJ. NEW YORK MARINE v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC., 08-5504-cv (L); Decided 03/15/10" Anthony J. Pruzinsky, John J. Sullivan, Robert G. Clyne, Hill Rivkins Hayde

    Publication Date: 2010-03-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Before: Miner and Straub, C.JJ. NEW YORK MARINE v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC., 08-5504-cv (L); Decided 03/15/10" Anthony J. Pruzinsky, John J. Sullivan, Robert G. Clyne, Hill Rivkin

  • Alameda County Flood Control, etc. v. Department Of Water Resources

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-15
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, John S. Poulos, Amy L. Pierce, Darcy L. Muilenburg; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Greg L. Johnson; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard and Edward J. Tiedemann, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 7, Alameda County Water District, City of Yuba City, County of Butte, County of Kings, Empire West Side Irrigation District, Kern County Water Agency, Napa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Oak Flat Water District, Plumas County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Santa Clara Valley Water District, Solano County Water Agency, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District. Amelia T. Minaberrigarai, for Plaintiff and Appellant Kern County Water Agency.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Denise Ferkich Hoffman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Matthew J. Goldman and Vera Sandronsky, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent, State of California, Department of Water Resources. Bingham McCutchen LLP, James J. Dragna, Colin C. West and Thomas S. Hixson, for Defendants, Interveners and Appellants Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Castaic Lake Water Agency, Central Coast Water Authority, Coachella Valley Water District, Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, Desert Water Agency, Littlerock Creek Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Mojave Water Agency, Palmdale Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and United Water Conservation District. Best Best & Krieger LLP and Robert M. Sawyer, for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, Ventura County Watershed Protection District. Marcia L. Scully, John Schlotterbeck, Heather C. Beatty and Karen L. Tachiki for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
    Case Number: No. C065522

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1904ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, ETC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.DEPARTMENT