Filter This View

  • Guilford Trans. Indus. Inc. v. Wilner

    Publication Date: 2000-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-13
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: SCHWELB, REID, and GLICKMAN, Associate Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John R. Fornaciari
    for defendant: Michael L. Martinez
    Case Number: No. 99-CV-349

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. SCHWELB, Associate Judge: This appeal arises from an action for libel. The plaintiffs are Guilford Transportation Ind

  • April 1, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Big Suits

    USA v. KBR et al.

    1 minute read

  • Phillips v. Ornoski

    Publication Date: 2012-03-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Robert E. Coyle, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen Reinhardt, and Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard Phillips, San Quentin, California, appearing pro se; Katherine L. Hart, Fresno, California, advisory counsel, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Catherine Chatman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California; Robert Todd Marshall, Assistant Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.
    Case Number: No. 04-99005

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3098 RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEVEN W. ORNOSKI, Resp

  • Barraco v First Lenox Terrace Associates

    Publication Date: 2006-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Malone, JJ. 7576. Paul Barraco plf-res, v. First Lenox Terrace Associates Defendants-Appellants-res, Appollon Waterproofi

  • Perry v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

    Publication Date: 2005-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Spatt This action arises out of claims by Sharon Fleming Perry (the "plaintiff" or "Perry") that her former empl

  • December 9, 1999 | Legal Times

    State Statutes are Important Y2K Tools

    At least 39 states have enacted or proposed Y2K laws. Some state statutes, such as Virginia's, impose stricter limits on liability and damages than federal law.While some state Y2K provision

    1 minute read

  • September 27, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 14, No. 187 - September 27, 2006

    Vol. 14, No. 187 - September 27, 2006 STATE COURT CASES CIVIL PROCEDURE - ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AFTER REINSTATEMENT OF COMPLAINT 07-3-5195 Sprankle v.

    1 minute read

  • Sanford v Colgate University

    Publication Date: 2007-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 501110

    Decided and Entered: January 11, 2007 501110 ________________________________ CHARLES H. SANFORD III et al., as Members of NEW YORK ZETA OF PHI DELTA THETA CORPORATION,

  • People v Alvarez

    Publication Date: 2008-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1957

    David Friedman Luis A. Gonzalez John W. Sweeny, Jr., JJ. 1957 Ind. 6210/04 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Enrique Alvarez, Defendant-Appe

  • Polimaster Ltd. v. RAE Systems, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Garden, Esq., Alexandria, Virginia, for appellants Polimaster Ltd., et al.
    for defendant: John P. Flynn, Esq., San Francisco, California, for appellee RAE Systems, Inc.
    Case Number: No. 08-15708 No. 09-15369

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12585POLIMASTER LTD.; NA&SE TRADING CO., LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RAE SYSTEMS