• Sumner Hill Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Rio Mesa Holdings, LLC

    Publication Date: 2012-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-02
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dowling, Aaron & Keeler, Lynne Thaxter Brown; Law Offices of Walter�W. Whelan, Walter W. Whelan and Brian D. Whelan for Plaintiffs and Appellants Sumner Hill Homeowners? Association, Inc., Michael Seng, Jim Hutton, Lelon Forlines, Rosa Forlines, Susan Early and John McGuckin; Robert J. Rosati for Plaintiff and Appellant David Kaye.
    for defendant: McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Charles A. Bird, Gerald M. Murphy, Anthony�D. Nash and Joshua M. Heinlein for Defendants and Appellants. Smiland & Chester, William M. Smiland, Theodore Chester; McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth and Marshall C. Whitney for Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Douglas W. Nelson, County Counsel, for County of Madera as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

    Case Number: No. F058617

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4862 SUMNER HILL HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. R

  • United States v. Thompson

    Publication Date: 2013-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney; Robert E. Dugdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Criminal Division; Justin R. Rhodes (argued) and Lana Morton-Owens, Assistant United States Attorneys, Violent & Organized Crimes Section, United States Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Mark Yanis (argued), Huntington Beach, California, for Defendant-Appellant Clinton Thompson, III. Gretchen Fusilier (argued), Carlsbad, California, for Defendant-Appellant Tavrion Dawson. Sean K. Kennedy, Federal Public Defender; Samuel A. Josephs (argued), Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defenders' Office, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellant Samuel Eaton.

    Case Number: No. 10-50381 No. 10-50479 No. 11-50081

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 9593 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLINTON ELWYN

  • Wolfchild v. United States

    Publication Date: 2009-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-10
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Bryson, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for plaintiffs-appellees Sheldon Peters Wolfchild, et al.: Erick Kaardal, Mohrman & Kaardal, Minneapolis.
    for defendant: Attorney for amicus curiae Shakopee Mdewakaton Sioux (Dakota) Community and Prairie Island Indian Community: Steven Gordon, Holland & Knight, Washington, D.C. Attorney for defendant-appellant: Aaron Avila, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: 2008-5018

    Before RADER, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.This case comes to us on interlocutory appeal from the Court of Federal Claims. The plaintiffs in the underlying action claimed that the government b

  • Borikas v. Alameda Unified School District

    Publication Date: 2013-03-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-06
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Randick O'Dea & Tooliatos, Leslie A. Baxter; Brillant Law Firm, David J. Brillant and Brian Carideo; and Umung D. Varma for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Chapman, Popik & White, Susan M. Popik and David Nied; Dannis Woliver Kelley, Sue Ann Salmon Evans, Janet L. Mueller and William B. Tunick for Defendant and Respondent. Lozano Smith, Jeffrey L. Kuhn and Sloan R. Simmons for California School Boards Association on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. A129295

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 2464GEORGE J. BORIKAS, as Trustee, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.ALAMEDA U

  • Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the Interior

    Publication Date: 2002-03-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-01
    Court: D.C.Cir.
    Judge: Circuit Judge Randolph
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-5223, Consoli

    Argued November 6, 2001Randolph, Circuit Judge: These are four consolidated cases on appeal from the judgment of the district court sustaining regulations of the National Park Service governing con

  • In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC

    Publication Date: 2010-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-22
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 09-4266 & 09-4349

    PRECEDENTIALArgued December 15, 2009Before: AMBRO, SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges.OPINIONWe are asked in this appeal to decide whether Section 1129(b)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code requir

  • Venetian Casino Resort L.L.C. v. Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas

    Publication Date: 2001-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Procter Hug, Jr. and Melvin Brunetti, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 00-15136

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.HUG, Circuit Judge: The question we are presented with in this appeal is whether a sidewalk constructed on private

  • December 26, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Janssen, respondent v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre, appellants

    Decided Dec. 16, 2008 Before Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson, Belen, JJ. APPEAL by the defendants, in an action, inter alia, to recover damages for sexual discrimination, fr

    1 minute read

  • November 13, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible Foreign Legal Consultants, Ineligible In-House Counsel and Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection Foreign legal consultants, in-house counsel, and pro hac vice attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New J

    1 minute read

  • February 6, 2002 | National Law Journal

    Top Defense Verdicts

    Plaintiffs' huge victories make headlines. Defendants often dodge disaster in obscurity. Yet many of the wins by defendants are as noteworthy as the megamillion judgments won by plainti

    1 minute read