Filter This View

  • Quick v. National Labor Relations Board

    Publication Date: 2001-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-27
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: McKEE, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 99-4043/00-

    Argued: July 13, 2000OPINION OF THE COURTWe are asked to decide if a "union security clause" in a collective bargaining agreement r equired an employee in a purported "union shop" to continue pa

  • Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District

    Publication Date: 2012-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-24
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad, Richard J. Schwab, Lawrence B. Trygstad, Daniel�J. Kolodziej and Lillian Kae, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, James Baca, Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia, and Heather A. Dozier, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B231787

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 960 ARI MARKEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRIC

  • July 19, 2012 | International

    Asia Deal Digest: July 19, 2012

    Japan Linklaters is representing Tokyo-based advertising firm Dentsu Inc. on its planned $5 billion acquisition of British competitor Aegis Group Plc. David

    1 minute read

  • December 27, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Yung, plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees v. Lee, defendant-appellee

    Decided Dec. 13, 2005Before Jacobs, Sack, and Raggi, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Deborah A. Batts, Judge

    1 minute read

  • February 24, 2010 | The Associated Press

    Senate approves tax breaks for new hires

    Companies that hire the unemployed would claim new tax breaks under a jobs-promoting bill the Senate passed Wednesday, delivering President Barack Obama and Democrats a much-needed vic

    1 minute read

  • Muniz v City of Schenectady

    Publication Date: 2007-03-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 501392

    Decided and Entered: March 1, 2007 501392 ________________________________ ROY MUNIZ et al., Respondents, v CITY OF SCHENECTADY et al.,

  • ROSEWOOD PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW FOR TOWN OF HAMBURG

    Publication Date: 2003-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: CA 03-00667

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department MATTER OF ROSEWOOD PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V BOA

  • USA v. The City of NY

    Publication Date: 2012-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-CV-2067 (NGG) (RLM)

    Cite as: USA v. The City of NY, 07-CV-2067 (NGG) (RLM), NYLJ 1202573468083, at *1 (EDNY, Decided September 18, 2012)District Judge Nicholas G. Garauf

  • Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-06-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-29
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: SEYMOUR and MURPHY, Circuit Judges,and KANE, Senior District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-2131

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. Gerald and Juana Martin appeal the district court's order dismissing their complaint with pr

  • Glendale Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2010-05-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-25
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Douglas J. Evertz; Glendale City Attorney?s Office, Gillian van Muyden, General Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant Glendale Redevelopment Agency. Goldfarb & Lipman, John T. Nagle, Juliet E. Cox for Plaintiff and Appellant Redevelopment Agency of the City of Compton. McDonough Holland & Allen, T. Brent Hawkins for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellants.
    for defendant: Elizabeth M. Cortez, Assistant County Counsel, Thomas M. Tyrrell, Principal Deputy County Counsel for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B212718, No. B213410

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6567GLENDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES