• Filippi v. Elmont Union Free School DistrictBoard of Education, 09-CV-4675

    Publication Date: 2010-07-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The attorneys for plaintiff: Eric S. Tilton of Eric S. Tilton, P.L.L.C. and Steven A. Morelli of The Law Offices of Steven A. Morelli, P.C.
    for defendant: The attorneys for defendants: Elmont Union Free School District Board of Education and Al Harper are Steven C. Stern and Leo Dorfman of Sokoloff Stern LLP, and Rondiene Erin Novitz of Cruser Mitchell & Novitz, LLP

    Case Number: 09-CV-4675

    Judge Joseph F. BiancoDecided: July 02, 2010The attorneys for plaintiff: Eric S. Tilton of Eric S. Tilton, P.L.L.C. and Steve

  • Cleveland Branch, NAACP v. City of Parma

    Publication Date: 2001-08-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-28
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: BOGGS and MOORE, Circuit Judges; COHN, Senior District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-3546

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. On August 6, 1990, Plaintiffs-Appellants, the Cleveland Branch of t

  • United States ex rel. Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York Inc. v. Westchester County, New York, 06 Civ. 2860

    Publication Date: 2009-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-24
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06 Civ. 2860

    District Judge Denise Cote U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff/Relator: Michael Allen Stephen M. Dane

  • September 27, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of Education

    Publication Date: 2013-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-11
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doll Amir & Eley, Michael M. Amir, Mary Tesh Glarum, Lloyd Vu and Hemmy So for Plaintiff and Respondent and for Plaintiff and Appellant. Debra J. La Fetra, Damien M. Schiff and Joshua P. Thompson for Pacific Legal Foundation and Options for Youth as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Ricardo J. Soto, Phillipa L. Altmann, Julie Ashby Umansky; McKenna Long & Aldridge and Charles A. Bird for California Charter Schools Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Amy Bisson Holloway, Edmundo R. Aquilar and Todd M. Smith for State Board of Education, California Department of Education and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson as Amici Curiae.
    for defendant: Vibiana M. Andrade, Sung Yon Lee; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Timothy T. Coates and Alison M. Turner for Defendants and Appellants and for Defendants and Respondents. Best Best & Krieger, Dina Harris and Megan M. Moore for Riverside County Office of Education and San Diego County Office of Education as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. David Holmquist and Devora Navera Reed for Los Angeles Unified School District as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. Dannis Woliver Kelly, Sue Ann Salmon Evans and William B. Tunick for Education Legal Alliance of the California School Boards Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. S195852 No. S195852

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7332 TODAY'S FRESH START, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v

  • March 3, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — PUBLIC UTILITIES 01-2-1157 In the

    1 minute read

  • July 8, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    People, plaintiff-respondent v. Richard A. Grasso, defendants-appellants

    Decided July 1, 2008 Before Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, McGuire, JJ. Defendant/crossclaim plaintiff Grasso and defendant Langone appeal from the order of the Supr

    1 minute read

  • October 2, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Yepez

    Publication Date: 2012-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-20
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding M. James Lorenz, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Appellate Section Criminal Division, and Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California, San Diego, California, for Appellee United States. Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Appellate Section Criminal Division, and Kyle W. Hoffman and Rebecca Suzanne Kanter, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California, San Diego, California, for Appellant United States.
    for defendant: Michael Edmund Burke, San Diego, California, for Appellant David Yepez. Vincent James Brunkow, Assistant Appellate Supervisor, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for Appellee Audenago Acosta-Montes.

    Case Number: No. 09-50271 No. 09-50409

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13869UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

  • January 22, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

    State v. Lee

    TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSTHE STATE OF TEXASV.DAVID ALLEN LEE, APPELLEE The opinion of the court was delivered by: Meyers, J. ON STATE'S PETITIONS

    1 minute read