• United States v. Sanchez-Ramirez

    Publication Date: 2009-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-30
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Howard, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-1116

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Farris, *fn1 and Howard, Circuit Judges.Following a bench trial in which the district court rejected his insanity defense, appellant Cos

  • Trach v. Fellin

    Publication Date: 2002-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-18
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Beck, J
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1921 EDA 2000, 1

    OPINION�1 In this case, involving the erroneous dispensation of a drug by a pharmacy, we consider whether under Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), the trial court improperly admit

  • September 26, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Treasure Hunters Fined $1M for Bad Faith Litigation

    In a blistering decision, a federal judge in Florida ordered a treasure hunting company to pay more than $1 million in attorney fees and sanctions for a “continuous, core campaign of b

    1 minute read

  • Fraser v. Fiduciary Trust Company International, 04 Civ. 6958

    Publication Date: 2009-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-25
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Paul Crotty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 04 Civ. 6958

    District Judge Paul A. Crotty U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Crotty OPINION & ORDE

  • United States of America v. Wahidullah Hossaini

    Publication Date: 2011-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-28
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-5014-cr

    09-5014-crUSA v. HossainiSUMMARY ORDERRulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by

  • United States v. Abdelshafi

    Publication Date: 2010-01-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-25
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Agee, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-4884

    PUBLISHEDArgued: December 2, 2009Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and John Preston BAILEY, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by desi

  • United States v. Millis

    Publication Date: 2010-09-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-02
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ann L. DeMarais, Tucson, Arizona, for the appellee.
    for defendant: William G. Walker, Tucson, Arizona, for the appellant.

    Case Number: No. 09-10134

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11562 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANIEL J. MILLIS, Defendant-Appellan

  • ENGELS v. REMS

    Publication Date: 2002-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Thursday, February 14, 2002 Supreme Court Suffolk County

  • Perez v. Volvo Car Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-05-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-02
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Selya, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-1867

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jos� Antonio Fust�, U.S. District Judge]In this case, purchasers of certain Volvo automobiles claim that they were

  • Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc.

    Publication Date: 1999-12-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-06
    Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Judge: Shabaz, Michel, Rader, and Gajarsa.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Russell J. Barron, et al.
    for defendant: David L. De Bruin, et al.

    Case Number: No. 99-1025,-1120

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin ruled that defen