Filter This View

  • Mitchell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2002-04-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-17
    Court: Pa. Commw. Ct.
    Judge: Judge Cohn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2217 C.D. 2001,

    Submitted: February 22, 2002OPINIONThese are consolidated appeals from two orders of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decisions of a Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ)

  • Wilson v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-08-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-30
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Kent C. Sullivan Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-08-00236-CR

    Affirmed and Opinion filed July 30, 2009.OPINIONAppellant, Marcus Anthony Wilson, was arrested and charged with burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit aggravated sexual assault, a fi

  • People v. Lai Lee, 2009NY013920

    Publication Date: 2009-07-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-02
    Court: Criminal Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Judge Marc J. Whiten NEW YORK COUNTY Criminal Court For the People: New York County District Attorney's Office; ADA Shawn McMahon, Esq. For the Defense: Jam

  • August 20, 2012 | Texas Lawyer

    Case Summaries

    Editor's note: What follows are summaries of state and federal appellate court opinions issued from Aug. 2 to Aug. 10. The list is organized by court and practice area. Names of the cases

    1 minute read

  • Brown v. Keane

    Publication Date: 2004-01-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Petitioner appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.) denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The court of appeals (Le

  • April 12, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Sanctions Denied in Handling Of Civil Suit Against Grubman

    RIVERHEAD - Supreme Court Justice Denise F. Molia has declined to impose sanctions against a Huntington attorney in connection with allegations of frivolous and deceitful handling of a civil suit a

    1 minute read

  • People v. Portorreal, 2009QN039176

    Publication Date: 2009-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-12-10
    Court: Criminal Court, Queens County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Judge Elisa S. rman QUEENS COUNTY Criminal Court Defense counsel: Nicholas of the law firm Hopkins and Kopilow People: ADA Carla Cheung Judge

  • Hasty Hills Stables Inc. v. Dorfman, Lynch, Knoebel Conway LLP

    Publication Date: 2005-09-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Mary Smith
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    ROCKLAND COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Smith Upon the foregoing papers, it is Ordered

  • Trocki Plastic Surgery Center v. Bartkowski

    Publication Date: 2001-10-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-17
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Parrillo, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-6487-99T2

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONSubmitted: October 2, 2001Defendants Thaddeus Bartkowski, Sr., and Ann C. Bartkowski- Parisi live in Pennsylvania and own a summ

  • Stonehill v. Internal Revenue Service

    Publication Date: 2009-03-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-06
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge: Rogers, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for appellant: Robert Heggestad, Troutman Sanders, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: Attorney for appellee: Jonathan Cohen, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 08-5060

    Argued December 4, 2008Before: HENDERSON, ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.The issue in this appeal is whether an agency may withhold documents under Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information