• Matsumoto v. Matsumoto

    Publication Date: 2002-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-30
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Long, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. A-81/82 Sept

    Argued September 24, 2001This case requires us to determine whether the fugitive disentitlement doctrine should be applied to bar an appeal in a civil case and if so, to limn its contours.I.D

  • Municipality of Mt. Lebanon v. Reliance Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2001-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-14
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Todd, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 759 WDA 2000

    J-A49033-00Appeal from the Judgment Entered April 13, 2000 In the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division Allegheny County, No. GD99-11299OPINION� 1 In this insurance coverage declaratory judgm

  • The Omega Institute Inc. v. Universal Sales Systems Inc., 08-CV-6473

    Publication Date: 2010-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-05
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Michael Telesca
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-CV-6473

    District Judge Michael A. Telesca U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Telesca DECISION AND O

  • People v Varmette

    Publication Date: 2010-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 100924

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 18, 2010 100924 THE PE

  • McClain v. Hall

    Publication Date: 2009-01-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-18
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Pryor, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-13487

    PUBLISHBefore BIRCH, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.The issue in this appeal is whether the Superior Court of Butts County, Georgia, unreasonably applied clearly established federal law when

  • Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Company, L.C.

    Publication Date: 2009-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-27
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Dale Wainwright Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-0729

    Argued February 13, 2007JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court.JUSTICE O'NEILL did not participate in the decision.In this oil and gas dispute, we determine whether section 85.

  • Matter of Rice v. Belfiore, 10274/06

    Publication Date: 2006-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-09-29
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Jonathan Lippman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10274/06

    WESTCHESTER COUNTY Supreme Court Lovett & Gould, LLP Attorneys for Petitioner Charlene M. Indelicato Westchester County Attorney Attorney fo

  • Matter of Bichoupan v. Board of Assessors, 002961/07

    Publication Date: 2007-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-05-31
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge: Dana F. Winslow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 002961/07

    Justice F. Dana Winslow NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiffs are represented by: Robert Bichoupan, Esq. Robert Bichoupan, P.C. The Defendants by:

  • February 22, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    On the Move

    Partners The litigation practice at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis of Newark welcomes Patrick Perrone, Frederic Giordano and Christopher

    1 minute read

  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. McBurrows

    Publication Date: 2001-06-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-31
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Orie Melvin, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2207 EDA 1999

    �1 In this prosecution for murder in the first degree, the Commonwealth has appealed from the Order which granted in part the defense's omnibus pre-trial motion to suppress the testimony of the Appell