• August 19, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

    Decided Aug. 14, 2008 Before Jacobs, Ch.J.; Cabranes, C.J., Vitaliano, D.J.* Appeal from orders entered in the district court for the Southern District of New York (Ca

    1 minute read

  • In the Matter of the Application of Richard Piekos, Holder of Twenty Percent or More of All Issued and Outstanding Shares of Home Studios Inc.—Petitioner v. For the Judicial Dissolution of Home Studio Inc., Pursuant to BCL §1104-a—Respondent, 12542/10

    Publication Date: 2010-08-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Justice Alan D. Scheinkman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Petitioner Richard Piekos: By: Michael A. Levy, Esq., Lewis R. Mandel, Esq., Levy & Schneps, P.C., Manhasset, New York
    for defendant: Former Attorney for Respondent Home Studios Inc.: Craig Avedisian, Esq., New York, New York Attorneys for Respondent Home Studios Inc.: Attorneys for Respondent Home Studios Inc., White Plains, New York

    Case Number: 12542/10

    Cite as: Matter of Piekos v. Home Studio Inc., 12542/10, NYLJ 1202469995780, at *1 (Sup., WE, Decided August 03, 2010)Justice Alan D. Scheinkmanp class="de

  • August 27, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    United States, appellee v. Joseph Amato and John Fasciana, defendants-appellants

    Decided Aug. 21, 2008 Before Cardamone, Miner, and Pooler, C.JJ. Defendants appeal judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

    1 minute read

  • Bruce G. Howell v. Motorola, Inc., et al

    Publication Date: 2011-01-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-21
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Wood, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-3837, No. 09-2796

    ARGUED OCTOBER 23, 2008 & MAY 27, 2010Before BAUER, WOOD, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.The two cases that we have consolidated for decision in this opinion both deal with the responsibilities

  • July 8, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    The Legal Staff's 2010 Summer Reading List

    "Summer vacation" means something very different to us as adults than it did during our school years. Whereas in childhood and adolescence it meant whole months of relaxation, these days

    1 minute read

  • City of Santa Maria v. Adam

    Publication Date: 2012-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-21
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Richard E. Adam et al. (Landowner Group Parties) Clifford & Brown; Richard G. Zimmer, E. Stewart Johnston Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Edward Wineman et al. (The Wineman Parties); Frame & Matsumoto, Ted R. Frame Counsel for Cross-complainant, Cross-defendant and Respondent: City of Santa Maria et al.; Best Best & Krieger, Jeffrey V. Dunn, Eric L. Garner, Jill N. Willis Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent: Golden State Water Company et al.; Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Rural Water Company; Arnold Bleuel et al., Robert S. Krimmer, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Nipomo Community Services District et al.; Richards Watson & Gershon, James L. Markman Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe, City of Pismo Beach et al.; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Grace I. Liu, Amanda M. Neal, Nossaman, Guthner et al., Henry S. Weinstock Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Burke Williams & Sorensen, Mark J. Mulkerin Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of San Benito et al.; Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Janet K. Goldsmith Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of Santa Barbara et al.; County Counsel, Kevin E. Ready, Sr., Stephen D. Underwood Counsel for Cross-defendants, and ,espondents: City of Grover Beach, City of Arroyo Grande, Oceano Community Services District; Nossaman, Guthner et al

    Case Number: No. H032750

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12972CITY OF SANTA MARIA et al., Cross-complainants, Cross-defendants and Respondents

  • October 1, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Stranded In Paradise

    For an international fugitive, Viktor Kozeny seems to have it pretty good. It's not quite the life of a decade ago, when

    1 minute read

  • May 17, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Prince v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

    Judge SweetRead the Full-Text Opinion Defendants Cablevision Systems Corporation ("C

    1 minute read

  • December 10, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    United States, appellee v. Gerard Cavera and Peter Abbadessa, defendants-appellants

    Decided Dec.4, 2008 Before Jacobs, Ch. J., Cardamone,* Calabresi, Cabranes, Straub,† Pooler, Sack, Sotomayor, Katzmann, Parker, Raggi, Wesley, Hall and Livingston, C.JJ.

    1 minute read

  • November 30, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Tabbaa, plaintiff-appellants v. Chertoff, defendant-appellees

    Decided Nov. 26, 2007Before Straub, Pooler, and B.D. Parker, C.JJ.Appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (William M.

    1 minute read