Filter This View

  • Mejia v. City of New York

    Publication Date: 2004-12-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Daniels Plaintiffs, by their mothers, bring suit against defendant alleging violations of their federal rights

  • Syncora Guarantee Inc., formerly known as XL Capital Assurance Inc., Plaintiff v. EMC Mortgage, LLC (Formerly Known as EMC Mortgage Corporation), Defendants, 650420/12

    Publication Date: 2013-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Justice Charles E. Ramos
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff: William Devaney, Esq., of Venable LLP.
    for defendant: Defendant: Sharon Nelles, Esq., of Sullivan Cromwell LLP; Richard Edlin, Greenberg Traurig LLP.
    Case Number: 650420/12

    Cite as: Syncora Guarantee v. EMC Mortgage, 650420/12, NYLJ 1202597024164, at *1 (Sup., NY, D April 15, 2013)Justice Charles E. Ramosp class="d

  • Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

    Publication Date: 2013-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-27
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-864

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3396COMCAST CORPORATION, , PETITIONERSv.CAROLINE BEHREND

  • September 27, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

    2011 Fast Track Judging Panelists

    The editors of The Legal Intelligencer would like to thank the legal professionals who agreed to donate their time and efforts to serve as judging panelists for our 2011 Lawyers on the Fas

    1 minute read

  • December 13, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Declaratory Judgment

    There continues to be a good deal of confusion and controversy about what kinds of things the Civil Court can and cannot hear. Often litigants and sometimes even courts will mistake a call for

    1 minute read

  • People v. Shawn Lindsey

    Publication Date: 2004-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Criminal Term, Part 2 Justice Tomei The defendant, Shawn Lindsey, charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, moves

  • April 4, 2005 | Legal Times

    For Coudert, Trouble on a Global Scale

    If any law firm could stake a claim to being cosmopolitan � even exotic � it's Coudert Brothers. The New York firm was in Paris a decade before the Eiffel Tower. Fluent French, Japanese,

    1 minute read

  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. Schwarzenegger

    Publication Date: 2008-06-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-04
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul E. Harris III and Anne M. Giese for Plaintiff and Respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 1000.
    for defendant: Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, Steven A. Merksamer, Richard D. Martland and Kurt R. Oneto for George Deukmejian, Pete Wilson and Gray Davis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.
    Case Number: C055327

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 6779CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,v.ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor, etc., et al., Defendants an

  • April 1, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Greenblatt v. Gluck

    Greenblatt v. Gluck Judge SweetGreenblatt v. Gluck - Defendant Robert W. Gluck ("Gluck") has moved to dismiss the complaint of pro se plaintiff Martin Greenblatt (&qu

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Kienan Jenkins

    Publication Date: 2003-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Casey UNITED STATES v. KIENAN JENKINS — Defendant Kienan Jenkins is charged in a one count indictment with possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1).