• People v Jackson

    Publication Date: 2008-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 101454

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 19, 2008 101454 THE PEOPLE

  • January 2, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Protecting Reputations

    The evidence in the case against Time Warner Cable Inc. seemed damning. At a company picnic, a doctored photo of an employee—a well-known New York television reporter&md

    1 minute read

  • Gross v. Lyons

    Publication Date: 2000-05-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-05-18
    Court: Fla. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth M. Rodriguez
    for defendant: Julie H. Littky-Rubin

    Case Number: No. SC94201

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. PER CURIAM. We have for review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appealaddressing the foll

  • December 16, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Court Implements Multijurisdictional Practice

    Rule changes that will revamp the practice of law in New Jersey, published today, will take effect Jan. 1. The Rules of Professional Conduct and certain Rules of General Application ha

    1 minute read

  • May 27, 1997 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 5, No. 99 -- May 27, 1997

    STATE COURT CASESDEBTOR/CREDITOR -- STATUTE OF FRAUDS15-2-2347 Sebring Assoc., etc., et al. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A., N.J., et al., App. Div. (8

    1 minute read

  • September 6, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Lines Blur Between Business, Personal Data

    Recent headlines have highlighted the blurring divide between professional and private e-mail accounts: The White House and its staffers were subjected to criticism and scrutiny for their use

    1 minute read

  • June 5, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Marshall v. Marshall

    CIVIL PRACTICE � Federal Jurisdiction � Probate Marshall v. Marshall No. 04-1544; U.S. Supreme Court; opinion by Ginsburg, J.; partial dissent by Stevens,

    1 minute read

  • PEOPLE v. FRANK CUTTITA

    Publication Date: 2003-12-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Sullivan County Justice Meddaugh The Petitioners commenced the above-captioned special proceeding by Order to Show Cause, dated February 28, 2003, seekin

  • SKF USA, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-08-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-24
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Dyk, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-1423,, 00-146

    Appealed from: United States Court of International TradeJudge Nicholas TsoucalasThese consolidated cases present the question whether the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") properly calculated

  • Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation and Parole

    Publication Date: 2009-01-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-31
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Hardiman, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 07-3720 & 07-3733

    PRECEDENTIALArgued September 29, 2008Before: FISHER, CHAGARES and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTState governments and their subsidiary units are immune from suit in federal