• Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bryan McCulley, McCulley McCluer PLLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Fred A. Kelly, Jr., Sarah E. Andre, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees New Albertson?s. Inc. and Supervalu Inc. Gregory P. Stone, Michael R. Doyes, Carolyn H. Luedtke, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Safeway Inc. Matt Oster, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Walgreen Co. Laurence A. Weiss, Kristi K. Elder, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellee The Kroger Co. Steven H. Frankel, Sandra D. Hauser, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Peter Buscemi, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Rite Aid Corp. Tami S. Smason, Robert H. Griffith, Page R. Barnes, Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees CVS Caremark Corp. and Longs Drugs Stores Corp.

    Case Number: No. 10-15338

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 1739 SKILSTAF, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. p cla

  • July 21, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    The Marshall Plan

    Every October, the townsfolk of Marshall gather for a festival honoring a pesky and ubiquitous local nuisance -- the fire ant. But another wave of critters with a potentially irritating bite h

    1 minute read

  • August 12, 2003 | The Recorder

    The Marshall Plan

    Every October, the townsfolk of Marshall, Texas, gather for a festival honoring a pesky and ubiquitous local nuisance -- the fire ant.But another wave of critters with a potentially ir

    1 minute read

  • In re: Musicland Holding Corp.v. Best Buy Co. Inc., 08-01023

    Publication Date: 2009-01-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-23
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Stuart Bernstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-01023

    Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Mark T. Power, Esq. John P. Amato, Esq.

  • June 17, 2003 | The Recorder

    The Marshall Plan

    Every October, the townsfolk of Marshall, Texas, gather for a festival honoring a pesky and ubiquitous local nuisance -- the fire ant.But another wave of critters with a potentially ir

    1 minute read

  • People v Colon

    Publication Date: 2009-04-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2006-07319

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. THOMAS A. DICKERSON ARIEL E. BELEN CHERYL E

  • February 17, 2003 |

    Jaffe Pleads Guilty to Federal Extortion ChargesPittsburgh - Allegheny County Judge Joseph A. Jaffe pleaded guilty last week to extorting money from an attorney and acknowledged

    1 minute read

  • Bernhard Christian Helgason, Plaintiff v. Certain State of New York employees (unknown and known), and government notably agency DHCR Defendants, Defendants, 10 Civ. 5116 (PAC) (JCF)

    Publication Date: 2011-07-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Paul A. Crotty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10 Civ. 5116 (PAC) (JCF)

    Cite as: Helgason v. Certain State of New, 10 Civ. 5116 (PAC) (JCF), NYLJ 1202499027846, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 24, 2011)District Judge Paul A. Cr

  • People v Adams

    Publication Date: 2007-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Decided and Entered: April 26, 2007 501496 ________________________________ In the Matter of the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ELIOT SPITZER, as Attorney General of

  • Meckham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

    Publication Date: 2004-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Appeal from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding defendants liable for disparate impact age discrimination under federal and state law, finding that defendants' violation was willful, an