Filter This View

  • Asch/Grossbardt Inc. v. Asher Jewelry Co. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2003-03-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Scheindlin ASCH/GROSSBARDT INC. v. ASHER JEWELRY COMPANY, INC. — Plaintiff Asch/Grossbardt Inc. (“Asch”) raised certain discovery problems in a letter dated Decemb

  • In re Pham

    Publication Date: 2010-03-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-04
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Adele Hedges Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 14-09-00387-CV, 14-08-01153-CV

    Appeal Dismissed, Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed March 4, 2010.ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGWRIT OF MANDAMUSMAJORITY OPINIONIn this m

  • February 24, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Judge Slashes Lawyer's Rate for Typos, Careless Writing

    Finding that attorney Brian Puricelli's courtroom work was "smooth" and "artful" in securing a $430,000 verdict in a civil rights suit, but that his written work was "careless" and laden with

    1 minute read

  • People v. Mil

    Publication Date: 2012-01-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-23
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Peter A. Smith, Janet A. Neeley, Charles A French and Craig S. Meyers, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Mark L. Christiansen, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S184665

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 912 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDUARDO MIL, JR., Defendant and Appel

  • October 17, 2011 | Daily Report Online

    Panel: No punitives for cell use

    A couple suing over an accident caused by a driver distracted by his cellphone is challenging a recent Court of Appeals ruling that barred pursuit of punitive damages. The Sept. 14 dec

    1 minute read

  • July 25, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    The Organic Cow LLC v. Center for New England Dairy Compact Research

    Decided July 8, 2003 Before Walker, Ch.J., Jacobs and Calabresi, C.JJ.Appeal from a district court decision granting summary judgment to substituted appellee, a private, not-for-pr

    1 minute read

  • April 2, 2007 | National Law Journal

    Insurance beefs cross the border

    We know about the reported inequity of indigent uninsured U.S. patients having to face sizable U.S. hospital bills while large health insurers receive heavy discounts. Congress has held

    1 minute read

  • February 4, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Pick Up Those Penalty Flags: Deregulating Professional Football

    During the National Football League playoffs, on any given Sunday (or Saturday), you're likely to find me sprawled in front of my television set, with one eye on a football game and the other

    1 minute read

  • June 23, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Breathalyzer Certificates Admissible in DWI Trials Without Cross-Examination

    The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled on Monday that documentation relating to Breathalyzer tests is admissible in drunken driving cases under the business-records exception to the hearsay rule.

    1 minute read

  • March 2, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

    TCJIU Urges Legislature to Address Faulty Eyewitness IDs

    Reforming eyewitness identification procedures used by law enforcement agencies should be the top priority of any legislative effort to address the problem of wrongful convictions in Texas, accordi

    1 minute read