Filter This View

  • April 8, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Special Committees: Process Makes Perfect

    1 minute read

  • Volpe v. Interpublic Group of Companies, 652308/2012

    Publication Date: 2013-08-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS Part Three
    Judge: Justice Eileen Bransten
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the plaintiff/opponent in first motion and movant in second motion: Neal Brickman, Esq., of The Law Offices of Neal Brickman, LLP.
    for defendant: For the defendant/movant in the dismissal motion and cross-movant in second motion: The attorneys on the matter were Hal S. Shaftel, Esq., of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.
    Case Number: 652308/2012

    Cite as: Volpe v. Interpublic Group of Companies, 652308/2012, NYLJ 1202616200647, at *1 (Sup. NY, Decided August 2, 2013) 652308/2012 Justice Eil

  • In re United States

    Publication Date: 2001-11-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-21
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Sloviter, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-2562

    Argued November 2, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTThis case is before us on a petition by the United States for a writ of mandamus directing a District Judge of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to

  • Gertrude Jean Pierre, Plaintiff v. Chase Investment Services Corp., Defendant, 10 Civ. 1740

    Publication Date: 2013-03-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff's Former Counsel: Linda M. Cronin, Esq., Cronin & Byczek LLP, Lake Success, NY. Plaintiff Pro Se: Gertrude Jean Pierre, Garden City, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant: Frederic L. Lieberman, Esq. JP Morgan Chase Legal Department, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 1740

    Cite as: Pierre v. Chase Investment Services Corp., 10 Civ. 1740, NYLJ 1202591283095, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 25, 2013)District Judge Shira Sche

  • Hobbs v. NYC Police Officers., 10 Civ. 5717

    Publication Date: 2013-07-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 5717

    Cite as: Hobbs v. NYC Police Officers., 10 Civ. 5717, NYLJ 1202609556559, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 14, 2013) 10 Civ. 5717 Magistrate Judge Henry

  • January 7, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Privacy and Technology: Balancing Competing Interests

    The law regarding the Fourth Amendment's application to digital evidence continues to evolve as each branch of government tries to keep pace with society's increased reliance on technology. A

    1 minute read

  • Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-11-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-13
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Rader, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 00-5109, -5

    Appealed from: United States Court of Federal ClaimsJudge Robert H. Hodges, Jr.Following a trial on damages for breach of contract, the United States Court of Federal Claims awarded Hughes Commu

  • Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Doe, 12-CV-1154 (ADS)(GRB)

    Publication Date: 2013-05-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiff by: Jason Aaron Kotzker, Esq., of Counsel, Kotzker Law Group, Highlands Ranch, CO.
    for defendant: Attorneys for the Defendant by: Michael A. Scotto, Esq., Robert C. Angelillo, Esq., of Counsel Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein PC, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 12-CV-1154 (ADS)(GRB)

    Cite as: Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Doe, 12-CV-1154 (ADS)(GRB), NYLJ 1202601021448, at *1 (EDNY, Decided May 18, 2013)District Judge: Arthur D. Sp

  • Hess v. Cohen & Slamowitz, 10-424

    Publication Date: 2011-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Pooler, Katzmann and Wesley, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian L. Bromberg, Bromberg Law Office, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Peter T. Lane, Bromberg Law Office, P.C., New York, N.Y., Anthony J. Pietrafesa, Law Office of Anthony J. Pietrafesa, Altamont, N.Y., on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel R. Ryan, Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse, N.Y., for Defendant-Appellee.
    Case Number: 10-424

    Cite as: Hess v. Cohen & Slamowitz, 10-424, NYLJ 1202483096129, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 23, 2011)Before: Pooler, Katzmann and Wesley, C.JJ.p c

  • February 27, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Realty Law Digest

    Allegations that Deed Was Intended as Security - Unjust Enrichment - Fraud - Unconscionability - RICO - Usury - Equitable Reformation - Deed Considered a Mortgage Under RPL �320 When Instru

    1 minute read