Filter This View

  • October 27, 1997 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 5, No. 203 -- October 27, 1997

    STATE COURT CASESATTORNEY/CLIENT -- ENTIRE CONTROVERSY -- DAMAGES04-2-3665 Bailey, et ux. v. Pocaro & Pocaro, et al., App. Div. (Newman, J.A.D

    1 minute read

  • April 6, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert -- Vol. 13, No. 67 - April 6, 2005

    Editor's Note: This Alert contains the cases which were scheduled to be released on Monday, April 4th, but were not, due to the courts being closed as a result of flo

    1 minute read

  • September 8, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Bowers v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al, etc.,

    This matter comes before this court on appeals by the University of Iowa, Delaware State University, the University of Massachusetts and the University of Memphis in an action Michael Bowers b

    1 minute read

  • Dias v. City and County of Denver

    Publication Date: 2009-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-05-27
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Lucero, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-1132

    PUBLISHBefore TACHA, EBEL, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.We consider a constitutional challenge to a Denver city ordinance banning a category of dogs commonly known as "pit bulls."a HREF="#D*fn1"

  • Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Medical Association

    Publication Date: 2012-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Bob Pemberton, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00673-CV

    OPINIONThe Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (TBCE), its executive director, and the Texas Chiropractic Association appeal a final district court judgment invalidating portions of

  • United States v. Boskic

    Publication Date: 2008-10-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-22
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lipez, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1188

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Tashima *fn1 and Lipez, Circuit Judges.This case requires us to address a number of important issues: the relationship between deceptive

  • Zubarau v. City of Palmdale

    Publication Date: 2011-01-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-27
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leonard J. Shaffer for Plaintiff and Appellant Alec Zubarau. Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper, and Christopher D. Imlay for The American Radio Relay League, Incorporated as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant Alec Zubarau.
    for defendant: City of Palmdale, Wm. Matthew Ditzhazy, City Attorney, Judy K. Skousen, Assistant City Attorney; Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Deborah J. Fox, and Dawn A. McIntosh for Defendant and Appellant City of Palmdale.
    Case Number: No. B216308

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1351ALEC ZUBARAU, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF PALMDALE, Defendant and Appellant. /

  • Filozof v. Monroe Community College, 04-CV-6545L

    Publication Date: 2008-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-28
    Court:
    Judge: David Larimer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-CV-6545L

    District Judge David G. Larimer U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Larimer DECISION AND ORDER On November 1, 2004, pla

  • March 14, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble

    Decided February 17, 2005Before Straub, Pooler, and B.D. Parker, C.JJ. Plaintiff-appellant Dawn Dawson appeals from the February 5, 2003, judgment of the United States District Cou

    1 minute read

  • United Property Owners Association of Belmar v. Borough of Belmar

    Publication Date: 2001-07-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-16
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Carchman, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2938-99T5,, A-

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONAs amended September 6, 2001Argued May 23, 2001These three appeals require us to determine the validity of a comprehensive lo