• July 18, 2008 | The Recorder

    Next Step: Ruby Slippers

    You may recall this publication running an article last month about changes in British judicial attire to

    1 minute read

  • May 13, 2013 | National Law Journal

    MOVERS

    LATERALSBaker & McKenzie: Adrienne Pitts joins the firm as partner in the Chicago office and will focus o

    1 minute read

  • May 10, 2002 | Texas Lawyer

    Attorney Try-Outs

    It's almost that time again -- when second-year law students shed their book-laden backpacks and try on Texas firms for size. And many of the state's top firms have more than enough planned to make

    1 minute read

  • January 13, 2012 | Daily Report Online

    Holland & Knight phases out tracking hours for lobbying

    Just in time for the beginning of the legislative session, Holland & Knight stopped tracking hours for lobbying clients on Jan. 1. These clients typically are billed a fixed retai

    1 minute read

  • August 26, 2013 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Pro Se Prisoner Win Rare is the pro se civil litigant, particularly one who resides in a unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, who wins a federal case. But Bryan Oscar C

    1 minute read

  • September 8, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Trench Warfare: Citi's Midyear Law Firm Review

    Looking at the 2010 midyear data reported to the Law Firm Group at Citi Private Bank by 187 U.S.–headquartered firms in our latest survey, we can best describe the results

    1 minute read

  • October 18, 2010 | Law.com Corporate

    European Rejection of Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Lawyers

    SPECIAL TO CORPORATE COUNSEL: In a striking example of formalism over realism, the European a href="http://europa.eu/institutions/inst/

    1 minute read

  • June 24, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Panel Upholds Preclusion Of Testimony On Causation

    A trial court properly performed its "gatekeeper" function when it precluded a neuropsychologist from offering an opinion about the proximate cause of the cognitive deficits of

    1 minute read

  • Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. County of Marin

    Publication Date: 2012-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-20
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CLINIC at STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, Deborah A. Sivas, Alicia E. Thesing, Leah J. Russin, Tori Ballif, and certified law student Peter Broderick; Michael W. Graf; Matthew Vespa and Ellen Medlin for Sierra Club as amicus curiae on behalf of plaintiff and respondent.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants and Respondents: Patrick K. Faulkner, Nancy S. Grisham; REMY THOMAS, MOOSE AND MANLEY, LLP, James G. Moose, Jennifer S. Holman, Jeannie Lee; BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP, Lisabeth D. Rothman, Rodd R. Leishman, and PERKINS COIE, LLP, Stephen L. Kostka for California Building Industry Association as amicus curiae on behalf of defendants and respondents; DOWNEY BRAND LLP, Christian L. Marsh, Andrew M. Skanchy for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as amicus curiae on behalf of defendants and respondents. Counsel for Interveners and Appellants: Charles D. Chalmers

    Case Number: No. A133109

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4387 SALMON PROTECTION AND WATERSHED NETWORK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF M

  • February 22, 2012 | Daily Report Online

    Bar challenged on discipline deal

    A lawyer discipline proceeding pending before the state Supreme Court has drawn the ire of those-including a former state Supreme Court chief justice and former Fulton County judge-who say th

    1 minute read