Filter This View

  • Grail Semiconductor Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electric Electronics USA, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2014-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-04-22
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant: Davis Wright Tremaine and Martin L. Fineman Russell J. Hanlon
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant and Appellant: Sidley Austin, Peter I. Ostroff, Mark E. Haddad and Michelle B. Goodman.
    Case Number: No. H038714

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 4248 GRAIL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MITSUBIS

  • April 18, 2014 | The Recorder

    Valley Firms Flex Brands at the Beach

    SAN FRANCISCO —The beachside corridor stretching from Venice to Santa Monica now houses hot startups such as Snapchat, incubators like Amplify L.A., cobbled-together campuses for b

    1 minute read

  • April 14, 2014 | Litigation Daily

    Sidley Dents SEC's 'Conflict Minerals' Rule in D.C. Circuit

    In the latest legal assault on government regulations promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Sidley Austin appellate partner Peter Keisler notched a

    1 minute read

  • April 14, 2014 | Legal Times

    D.C. Circuit Trims SEC 'Conflict Minerals' Disclosure Rule

    A federal securities rule that requires companies to publicly declare whether certain minerals used in products are "conflict free" violates the First Amendment, a divided federal

    1 minute read

  • April 14, 2014 | Legal Times

    D.C. Circuit Trims SEC 'Conflict Minerals' Disclosure Rule

    A federal securities rule that requires companies to publicly declare whether certain minerals used in products are "conflict free" violates the First Amendment, a divided federal

    1 minute read

  • Robert Ross, et al., Plaintiffs v. American Express Company, et al., Defendants, 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)

    Publication Date: 2014-04-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: All Counsel of Record: Merrill G. Davidoff, Esq., David A. Langer, Esq., Charles P. Goodwin, Esq., Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA. Counsel for Plaintiffs: Christopher M. Burke, Esq., Scott + Scott LLP, San Diego, CA.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants American Express: Evan Chesler, Esq., Gary Bornstein, Esq., Rowan Wilson, Esq., Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for Defendants Discover: Robert Y. Sperling, Esq., Malcom Cox, Esq., Ronald S. Betman, Esq., Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL. Counsel for Defendants Citigroup: David Graham, Esq., Theodore R Scarborough, Jr., Esq., Patrick E. Croke, Esq., Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL.
    Case Number: 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)

    Cite as: Ross v. American Express Co., 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP), NYLJ 1202650972862, at *1 (SDNY, Decided April 10, 2014) 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)/

  • April 3, 2014 | International

    Asia Deal Digest: April 3, 2014

    Australia HWL Ebsworth is advising Australian shopping mall developer Westfield Group on a $20 billion loan to finance the company’s proposed r

    1 minute read

  • March 17, 2014 | Texas Lawyer

    Deal of the Week Archive

    Baker Botts Heads $520 Million Deal March 17, 2014 Baker Botts is representing Chesapeake Energy Corp. in

    1 minute read

  • March 17, 2014 | National Law Journal

    Legal Department of the Year: Exelon Corp.

    When Exelon Corp. absorbed Constellation Energy Group Inc. in 2012, the legal department spread word of its values with Constellation colleagues whose department had lacked internal diversit

    1 minute read

  • March 12, 2014 | The American Lawyer

    Sidley, V&E Advise on $2.3 Billion Upstream Energy Deal

    CORRECTION, 3/13/14, 11:00 a.m. EDT: The original version of this article misspelled the name of Vinson & Elkins partner T. Mark Kelly. We

    1 minute read