Filter This View

  • Lisa K. Miller and Dean G. Miller Plaintiffs v. Elexco Land Servs., Inc.; Ansbro Petroleum Co., LLC; Anschutz Exploration Corp.; Anschutz Co.; and The Anschutz Corp., Defendants, 5:09-CV-0038 (GTS/DEP)

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Lee S. Michaels, Esq. of Counsel, Michaels & Smolak, P.C., Auburn, NY.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendant Elexco: R. Anthony Rupp, III, Esq., Joseph G. Ulatowski, Esq. of Counsel, Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola LLC, Buffalo, NY. Counsel for Defendants Anbro and Anschutz: Daniel R. Ryan, Esq., Aimee M. Paquette, Esq. of Counsel, Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse, NY.
    Case Number: 5:09-CV-0038 (GTS/DEP)

    Cite as: Miller v. Elexco Land Servs., Inc., 5:09-CV-0038 (GTS/DEP), NYLJ 1202518054254, at *1 (NDNY, Decided September 27, 2011)District Judge Glenn T. S

  • November 13, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible Foreign Legal Consultants, Ineligible In-House Counsel and Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection Foreign legal consultants, in-house counsel, and pro hac vice attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New J

    1 minute read

  • June 19, 2006 | National Law Journal

    The 100 most influential lawyers in America

    sp

    1 minute read

  • November 5, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Big Suits

    Apple v. Samsung  et al.In the leading edge of dozens of disputes worldwide between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. over smartphone

    1 minute read

  • Wilson v. Central Intelligence Agency

    Publication Date: 2009-11-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-11-12
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4244-cv

    Argued: January 8, 2009Before: KATZMANN and RAGGI, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, District Judge.*fn2Judge Katzmann concurs in the judgment of the Court and files

  • Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2013-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-08-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Tracy Christopher Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-09-00118-CV

    On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2006-70615 Pa

  • In re: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al., Debtor, 11-CV-1338 (CS)

    Publication Date: 2011-11-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Cathy Seibel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Co-Counsel for Appellants Long Island Lighting Company, et al.: Elisa M. Pugliese, Cullen and Dykman LLP, Brooklyn, NY. Co-Counsel for Appellants Long Island Lighting Company, et al., Co-Counsel for Appellants Jersey Central Power & Light Company, et al.: Russell R. Johnson III, John M. Craig, Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC, Manakin-Sabot, Virginia. Co-Counsel for Appellants Jersey Central Power & Light Company, et al.: Thomas R. Slome Jessica G. Berman, Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. Garden City, NY. Counsel for Appellants Potomac Electric Power Company, et al., Counsel for Appellant Washington Gas Light Company: William Douglas White, McCarthy & White, PLLC, McLean, Virginia Counsel for Appellees The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al.: Andrew M. Genser, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-CV-1338 (CS)

    Cite as: In re: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 11-CV-1338 (CS), NYLJ 1202532983637, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 14, 2011)District Judge Cathy

  • Griffith v. Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency

    Publication Date: 2013-10-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-10-15
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant Harold Griffith: In pro. per. Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants Joseph P. Pendry, James Spain, Yuet-Ming Chu, William McGrath, Henry Schimpeler: Johnson & James, Robert K. Johnson
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendant/Respondent Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency: Colantuono & Levin, Michael G. Colantuono, Amy C. Sparrow, Michael R. Cobden; Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich, George J. Kovacevich, Anthony P. Condotti, S. Adair Paterno Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents for Association of California Water Agencies and California State Association of Counties: Aleshire & Wynder, Patricia J. Quilizapa
    Case Number: No. H038087 No. H038264

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11420 HAROLD GRIFFITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PAJARO VALLEY W

  • February 24, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Top 10 Texas Plaintiffs Verdicts in 2002

    Editor's note: The following are the top 10 Texas verdict summaries of 2002, according to The National Law Journal, an affiliate of Texas Lawyer. The verdicts are ranked by dollar amo

    1 minute read

  • February 24, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Top 10 Texas Settlements in 2002

    The following are the top 10 settlement summaries, ranked by dollar amount, of 2002 according to Texas Blue Sheet, a weekly publication of The National Law Journal's Litigation Servic

    1 minute read