Filter This View

  • February 12, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — BIDDING PROCESS — PROTEST 01-2-2672 Bid Solicitation #08-X-39458 Advertising and Public Relations Services, Departm

    1 minute read

  • SP Terrace, L.P. v. Meritage Homes of Texas, LLC

    Publication Date: 2010-10-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-21
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Jane Bland Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-09-00155-CV

    OPINION ON REHEARINGIn this dispute over an earnest money contract to develop a plat of real estate, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Meritage Homes of Texas, LLC (Meritage)

  • Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Publication Date: 2001-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-24
    Court: D.C.Cir.
    Judge: Per Curiam*fn1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-1457,, Consol

    Argued April 24, 2001On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection AgencyIn this case, industry and environmental petitioners challenge EPA air pollution standards for haza

  • Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-07
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eisenberg & Associates, Michael B. Eisenberg and Joseph S. Socher for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Charles A. Bird and Aaron T. Winn for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. D055549

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11755ROBERT SANDELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TAYLOR-LISTUG, INC., Defendant and Respond

  • City of Santa Maria v. Adam

    Publication Date: 2012-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-21
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Richard E. Adam et al. (Landowner Group Parties) Clifford & Brown; Richard G. Zimmer, E. Stewart Johnston Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Edward Wineman et al. (The Wineman Parties); Frame & Matsumoto, Ted R. Frame Counsel for Cross-complainant, Cross-defendant and Respondent: City of Santa Maria et al.; Best Best & Krieger, Jeffrey V. Dunn, Eric L. Garner, Jill N. Willis Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent: Golden State Water Company et al.; Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Rural Water Company; Arnold Bleuel et al., Robert S. Krimmer, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Nipomo Community Services District et al.; Richards Watson & Gershon, James L. Markman Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe, City of Pismo Beach et al.; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Grace I. Liu, Amanda M. Neal, Nossaman, Guthner et al., Henry S. Weinstock Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Burke Williams & Sorensen, Mark J. Mulkerin Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of San Benito et al.; Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Janet K. Goldsmith Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of Santa Barbara et al.; County Counsel, Kevin E. Ready, Sr., Stephen D. Underwood Counsel for Cross-defendants, and ,espondents: City of Grover Beach, City of Arroyo Grande, Oceano Community Services District; Nossaman, Guthner et al
    Case Number: No. H032750

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12972CITY OF SANTA MARIA et al., Cross-complainants, Cross-defendants and Respondents

  • September 5, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    L�pez Torres, plaintiffs-appellees v.New York State Board of Elections, defendants-appellants

    Decided Aug. 30, 2006Before Straub, Sotomayor, and Hall, C.JJ.[Appendix and Maps Deleted for Publication] Appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction by the Un

    1 minute read

  • Greenwood v. Lee

    Publication Date: 2012-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Mackey K. Hancock Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-11-00404-CV

    Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.OPINIONAppellants, Kyle and Beverly Greenwood, defendants and counterplaintiffs below, appeal the trial court's summary judgment which

  • Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Blank

    Publication Date: 2012-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: Consuelo M. Callahan and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman,
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark A. White and Andrea Kendrick, Chapman Popik & White LLP, San Francisco, California; Mary L. Hudson (argued), Law Office of Mary L. Hudson, Sausalito, California; Alan Waltner, Law Offices of Alan Waltner, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: Ignacia S. Moreno, Meredith Flax, Romney Philpott, Joseph Matthews, Brian C. Toth (argued), U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C.; Mariam McCall, Office of General Counsel, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, for the defendants-appellees. Shirish Gupta, San Mateo, California, for amicus curiae Food & Water Watch, Inc. Michael F. Scanlon and J. Timothy Hobbs (argued), K&L Gates LLP, Seattle, Washington, for amici curiae Environmental Defense Fund, United Catcher Boats, and Midwater Trawlers Cooperative.
    Case Number: No. 11-17108

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10453 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS; PORT ORFORD OCEAN RESOURCE TEAM; SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATIO

  • April 5, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Discussing Concrete Solutions to the Diversity Problem

    The editorial staff of The Legal Intelligencer understands that diversity is a continuing concern in the legal community. This discussion is a follow-up to one we held in 2009 regarding the

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Wilbur

    Publication Date: 2012-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-06
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Before: Stephen Reinhardt, William A. Fletcher, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Helen J. Brunner, Richard Edward Cohen, Mary K. Dimke, J. Tate London, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Seattle, Washington, for the appellee.
    for defendant: James E. Lobsenz, CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN, P.S., Seattle, Washington, for the appellants.
    Case Number: No. 10-30185 No. 10-30186 No. 10-30187 No. 10-30188

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3830 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C. MARVIN WILBUR, AKA Marvin Wi