Filter This View

  • Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven M. Watt, Ben Wizner (argued), Jameel Jaffer and Steven R. Shapiro, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York; Ann Brick and Julia Harumi Mass, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, San Francisco, California; Paul Hoffman, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Venice, California; Hope Metcalf, National Litigation Project, Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Clive Stafford-Smith and Zachary KatzNelson, Reprieve, London, England, for plaintiff-appellant Binyam Mohamed. Margaret L. Satterthwaite and Amna Akbar, International Human Rights Clinic, Washington Square Legal Services, Inc., New York, New York, for plaintiff-appellant Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah.
    for defendant: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Paul J. Watford, Mark R. Yohalem and Henry Weissmann, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. Ian Heath Gershengorn, Michael F. Hertz, Joseph P. Russoniello, Douglas N. Letter (argued), Sharon Swingle and Michael P. Abate, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-appellee United States of America. Gary Bostwick and Jean-Paul Jassy, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Los Angeles, California, for amici curiae Professors William G. Weaver and Robert M. Pallitto. Barbara Moses and David J. Stankiewicz, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York, New York; Aziz Huq and Jonathan Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, New York, New York, for amici curiae former United States diplomats. Wiliam J. Aceves, California Western School of Law, San Diego, California; Gerald Staberock and Carlos Lopez, International Commission of Jurists, Geneva, Switzerland; Carla Ferstman, Lorna McGregor and Lucy Moxham, REDRESS, London, United Kingdom; Denna R. Hurwitz, Human Rights Program, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia, for amici curiae REDRESS and the International Commission of Jurists. Stephen I. Vladeck, American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.; Natalie L. Bridgeman, Law Offices of Natalie L. Bridgeman, San Francisco, California, for amici curiae professors of constitutional law, federal jurisdiction and foreign relations law. Andrew G. McBride, Thomas R. McCarthy and Stephen J. Obermeier, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Daniel J. Popeo and Richard A. Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., for amici curiae Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation. Richard R. Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, California; Cindy A. Cohn, Lee Tien, Kurt Opsahl, Kevin S. Bankston, Corynne Mcherry and James S. Tyre, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation. James M. Ringer, Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, New York, for amici curiae Commonwealth Lawyers Association and JUSTICE.
    Case Number: No. 08-15693

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11814 BINYAM MOHAMED; ABOU ELKASSIM BRITEL; AHMED AGIZA; MOHAMED FARAG AHMAD BASHMILAH; BISHER AL-RAWI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, p class=

  • People v. Poulsom

    Publication Date: 2013-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-31
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julia L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Lilia E. Garcia and Lynne G. McGinnis, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Laurel M. Nelson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. D060779

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1261THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,v.MICHAEL POULSOM, Defendant and Appella

  • Farlow v. Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital and Texas Health Resources, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-05-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Terrie Livingston Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-07-423-CV

    OPINIONI. IntroductionThis is a medical malpractice case in which appellants are attempting to impute liability for a doctor's negligence to both the hospital where he performed surgery and the

  • United States v. Alan Quinoes, Diego B. Rodriguez, 04-5554-cr

    Publication Date: 2008-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-12-28
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Reena Raggi
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-5554-cr

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT David L. Lewis, Lewis & Fiore, LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellant Alan Quinones. Jean D. Barrett, Ruhnke & Ba

  • Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America

    Publication Date: 2012-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Paul G. Gardephe
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 4426 (PGG)

    Cite as: Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America, 10 Civ. 4426 (PGG), NYLJ 1202572747419, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 5, 2012)District Judge Paul G.

  • June 27, 2001 | Special To Law.Com

    The Supremes' Penultimate Gasp

    You are probably familiar with the old paradox that a dropped object will never hit the ground because it keeps falling only half the remaining distance. Days like Monday make me feel th

    1 minute read

  • Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher Organization

    Publication Date: 2012-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-09
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff and Respondent: Lawrence Hecimovich, in pro. per.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Appellants: Kirtland & Packard, Robert A. Muhlbach, Robert K. Friedl, and Jennifer Boldi
    Case Number: No. A130852

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 1770 LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ENCINAL SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER O

  • Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. Guidry

    Publication Date: 2009-02-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Eva M. Guzman Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-05-01090-CV

    Motion for Rehearing Granted; Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, Dismissed in Part, and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed February 3, 2009.MAJORITY OPINION ON REHE

  • September 19, 2008 | The Recorder

    Highlights of Post-Merger Laterals

    We've kept track of more than 100 lawyers who have left Thelen since its late 2006 merger with Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner. The combined firm a href="http://64.233.1

    1 minute read

  • October 16, 1999 |

    Overview of Corporate Partnering and Strategic Alliances

    I. INTRODUCTION Entering into a technology-based corporate partnering arrangement (or strategic technology alliance) is one of the most important decisions a company can make. Although a fe

    1 minute read