Filter This View

  • Wandering Dago Inc. v. New York State Office of General Services, 1:13-cv-1053

    Publication Date: 2014-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: George F. Carpinello, Esq., of Counsel, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Albany, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants New York State Office of General Services, RoAnn M. Destito, Joseph J. Rabito, William F. Bruso, Jr., Aaron Walters, and the State of New York: Laura A. Sprague, AAG, of Counsel, Office of the New York State Attorney General, Albany, NY. Attorneys for Defendants New York Racing Association, Inc., Christopher K. Kay, and Stephen Travers: Henry M. Greenberg, Esq., Cynthia E. Neidl, Esq., Stephen M. Buhr, Esq., of Counsel, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Albany, NY.
    Case Number: 1:13-cv-1053

    Cite as: Wandering Dago Inc. v. New York State Office of General Services, 1:13-cv-1053, NYLJ 1202639261281, at *1 (NDNY, Decided January 15, 2014) 1:13-cv-1053p c

  • January 17, 2014 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Legal Battle Over Bottle Deposits May Be Heard By U.S. Supreme Court

    It's a dispute over a nickel. But for bottle distributors these nickels add up. And when that same thought dawned on state lawmakers, a legal battle unfolded that last year

    1 minute read

  • January 3, 2014 | National Law Journal

    Antitrust Claims Against Milk Processors Reinstated

    A federal appeals court has reinstated an antitrust complaint against a milk processor, ruling that the trial judge used the wrong standard for excluding an expert witness. On Friday

    1 minute read

  • December 23, 2013 | National Law Journal

    MOVERS

    NEW ARRIVALS McGuireWoods: Barbara de Marigny joins the tax practice as partner in the Houston office and will focus on ta

    1 minute read

  • Barenboim v. Starbucks, 10-4912-cv

    Publication Date: 2013-11-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Raggi, Ann Livingston, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellants: Shannon Liss-Riordan, Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, Massachusetts; Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum, Joseph, Herzfeld, Hester & Kirschenbaum LLP, New York, New York.
    for defendant: For Appellee: Daniel L. Nash, Nathan J. Oleson, Kelly M. Scindian, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C.; Samidh Guha, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, New York; Rex S. Heinke, Gregory W. Knopp, Katharine J. Galston, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, California.
    Case Number: 10-4912-cv

    Cite as: Barenboim v. Starbucks, 10-4912-cv, NYLJ 1202629231299, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 21, 2013) 10-4912-cv Before: Winter, Raggi, Ann

  • Barenboim v. Starbucks Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Raggi, and Livingston, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Jeana Barenboim and Jose Ortiz Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum, Joseph, Herzfeld, Hester & Kirschenbaum LLP, New York, New York, on the brief, Shannon Liss-Riordan Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, Massachusetts. For Eugene Winans, Michael Bienthcs, Reynolds Mangones, Matthew Taber, and Kristen Tomaino: Paul W. Mollica, Adam T. Klein, on the brief, Lewis M. Steel Outten & Golden LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Samidh Guha, Gregory W. Knopp, Daniel L. Nash, Nathan J. Oleson, Johanna R. Shargel, on the brief, Rex S. Heinke, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 10-4912-cv

    Cite as: Barenboim v. Starbucks Corp., 10-4912-cv, NYLJ 1202582323913, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided October 23, 2012)Before: Winter, Raggi, and Livingston,

  • Barenboim v. Starbucks Corp., 10-4912-cv

    Publication Date: 2012-10-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Raggi, and Livingston, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Jeana Barenboim and Jose Ortiz: Shannon Liss-Riordan (Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum, Joseph, Herzfeld, Hester & Kirschenbaum LLP, New York, New York, on the brief), Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, Massachusetts. For Eugene Winans, Michael Bienthcs, Reynolds Mangones, Matthew Taber, and Kristen Tomaino: Lewis M. Steel (Paul W. Mollica, Adam T. Klein, on the brief), Outten & Golden LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Rex S. Heinke (Samidh Guha, Gregory W. Knopp, Daniel L. Nash, Nathan J. Oleson, Johanna R. Shargel, on the brief), Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 10-4912-cv

    Cite as: Barenboim v. Starbucks Corp., 10-4912-cv, NYLJ 1202576133654, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 23, 2012)Before: Winter, Raggi, and Livingston,

  • June 25, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Leslie Turner's Sweet New Gig as Hershey General Counsel

    The Hershey Company has named Leslie Turner to a sweet gig as its new senior vice president, general counsel and secretary. Turner, who starts at Hershey on July 9, will report to president a

    1 minute read

  • July 11, 2002 | Legal Times

    Inside the D.C. Top 20 Firms

    Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & FeldBalance, in good times and in bad, has been R. Bruce McLean's mantra for the past few years. And given Akin Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld's

    1 minute read

  • October 11, 2007 | The Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin

    Exploring the Option of Product Recall Insurance

    In recent months, it has seemed that barely a week has gone by without the announcement of a major product recall, whether it be of pet food (tainted with a wheat gluten additive), toothpaste (cont

    1 minute read